Delete comment from: Elements Of Power
S.O.
Your first comment was nothing other than a series of assertions unsupported by fact and yet presented as if they were self-evident truths. You've gone downhill from there. If you had a good argument against the LRS-B it would have been easy for you to lay out to the rest of us for further, rational discussion.
We MIGHT have played '5 whys' and get to the real root of your concern with the LRS-B and 'defense' in general, but aside from being a semi-revealed mystery, who now cares? Others have saved me the trouble of dissecting your nonsense.
You can take a position I hate until the "cows come home" as long as your argument is cogent, avoids needless repetition and you do not try to pass off opinions as absolute truth. But if you make any more rationally unsupported assertions, or offer another "fallacious appeal to fill-in-the-blank, it's "Buh-Bye".
I'm probably even going to express some LRS-B reservations myself along with why they are reservations sometime AFTER the contract is awarded, and also posit as to how the AF and/or LRS-B in its execution might overcome my reservations. But the reasons for the reservations will be provided and I'll be sure to use words like "I think" or "I believe" whenever required and not expect anyone to just take my word for it without challenge.
You don't like current defense (and national) priorities. We get it...and yet you've not provided one cogent rationale why anyone should care one way or the other, or spend their time trying to figure out if we SHOULD care. Feel free to go play at Don Bacon's lonely outpost and commiserate with the little Anarcho-Capitalist himself or do something similar elsewhere if all you want is reaffirmation.
Jun 1, 2015, 9:51:23 PM
Posted to I Believe the First Hit Piece Against the LRS-B Has Been Written