Delete comment from: The War on Guns
Kevin Wilmeth said...
Twenty-four shots, eh? Presuming a pistol, that would be at least one reload. A private citizen would be strung up on both the number of shots and on the premeditation of a reload, not to mention prior history and circumstance.
But for a documentably deranged Only One? Carry on, domestic soldier.
Hell, we might as well have the exemption--its only real effect would be to clear up an administrative inefficiency in reaching the same conclusion the state already comes to. Since the ultimate state exoneration of any state committed atrocity is predetermined, why drag it out in state review?
Oct 12, 2009, 7:48:07 PM

