Delete comment from: The War on Guns
I have come to my conclusions through dealing with Stewart online for a long time, although he probably doesn't remember me or know who I am because of my alias.
He is not "asking people to refresh their oaths to forcibly impose a concept and vision of government", but is asking them to renew their oaths as a wake-up exercise against forcibly imposing anything of the sort, no matter what their orders may be. Oath Keepers is not about "force" or "imposing" but is about refusing to use force or imposing anything.
My "complaint", besides being no fan of the Constitution, is that I have yet to see any real refusal on the part of individual Oath Keepers to actually refuse to follow orders that use force to "impose a concept and vision of government", but that is all the group is about: Non-action (when the action is "unconstitutional") instead of action. Non-action is not force.
Jan 14, 2010, 12:43:09 PM
Posted to We're the Only Ones Unfortunately Incidental Enough