Delete comment from: The War on Guns
Sisce all of us can read the plain language of 2A - Isn't this really a test of the Supreme Court adhering to their oath?
As all laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void (John Marshall,SCOTUS, Marbury vs Madison 1803)... Do not Courts and Governments which act in a manner repugnant to the Constitution make themselves Null and Void?
As SCOTUS can declare laws null and void, the role of the people is to determine if/when the Court and/or the Government acts contrary to the agreement constituted among men. "It is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
Does the government still hold to the agreement, plainly worded and instituted among Men? Or do they ignore it, nullifying the agreement, thereby nullifying themselves?
We watch and wait.
Mar 2, 2010, 4:02:53 PM
Posted to Chicago Gun Case Argued Before Supreme Court Today