Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: "WE THE PEOPLE"

"TRANSPARENCY: HPD RELEASES BODY WORN CAMERA POLICY FOR REVIEW"

12 Comments -

1 – 12 of 12
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There goes the officer's discretion. And they thought dual domestic arrests were high before.....

January 30, 2019 at 10:40 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So when is chief rosado going to take action on one of his sgts making and admiting to making very sexual related comments to a female officer?? I know rodney was buckshots personnel driver for a time, but that is no excuse. I guess all the posters pinned to boards around city buildings that read “zero tolerance” mean nothing if you have connections. Release those iad tapes for all to hear. I bet if it was a white supervisor, swift barone esk action would have been taken.
The AR-15 incident was squashed for rodney and now i guess its the same.
I hope this female officer files a massive lawsuit against the city for failing to do anything. Why has that supervisor not been transferred far away ? Why does that supervisor still attend in service training with the female officer in question? These are all simple questions that will be asked by an attorney right before a massive payout by the city of hartford.

January 31, 2019 at 8:11 AM

Blogger KEVIN BROOKMAN said...

8:11AM

MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING DEALT WITH

January 31, 2019 at 2:43 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Transferred far away where? He’s already in T/S, what’s next? Hartford is a very small city. Stop harassing Rodney.

January 31, 2019 at 5:51 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So its ok to make sexual lewd comments to a female minority employee and get away with it?

February 1, 2019 at 9:05 AM

Anonymous No more union dues said...

Where is this transparency you spew about? You mean “ buckshot transparency “... selective judgement as usual operating procedure here at the “farm. “
Where is the dinity in making lewd and deeogatory univited remarks to a co worker. Politics has once again reared its ugly face to further denonise.

February 1, 2019 at 11:20 AM

Blogger KEVIN BROOKMAN said...

No more Union dues

The fact that the policy was released shows transparency. As far as the employee making derogatory and homophobic remarks to an employee without any repercussions is a good question.

Maybe the fact that the same employee is on the Democratic Town Committee and was standing directly behind Mayor Bronin on the steps of City Hall when he announced his bid for reelection. Maybe that might explain who his "hook" is.


It might also explain how that same employee could remove an assault rifle from guns collected at a gun buyback, "for his own personal collection" without any repercussions

February 1, 2019 at 12:11 PM

Blogger KEVIN BROOKMAN said...

9;05am

I guess "zero tolerance" means different things to different people depending who you are

February 1, 2019 at 12:14 PM

Anonymous Long Live Janus said...

What about the Lieutenant who heard the remarks being made and admittedly did nothing. I think they call that Failure to Supervise. Where is his discipline?

February 1, 2019 at 12:20 PM

Blogger Kozi said...

How about this: Hartford city taxpayers are on the hook for additional funds for the city’s police body camera program because city officials failed to submit paperwork to the state in time for full reimbursement.
So typical.....

February 10, 2019 at 9:13 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

@Kozi

Do you know the figure the amount Hartford will need to spend?

February 13, 2019 at 11:10 PM

Blogger Kozi said...

Anonymous 11:10 PM:

I believe I got this information from The Courant...

February 15, 2019 at 5:01 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot