Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: "WE THE PEOPLE"

"DEMS TO GOP : WE REJECT YOUR SUPPORT"

9 Comments -

1 – 9 of 9
Anonymous Boystown Social Administrator said...

One of Pedro's staffers that loiter's and hangs around at the Library at night,for no apparent discernible reason other then talking to young boys might be looking for a job in Pedro's administration this January in "Youth Services"

September 28, 2011 at 1:41 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

at least the staffer has a car because some months ago he was loitering around the library at night and tried to convince Pedro's teenage nephew to " take a ride with him"

September 28, 2011 at 1:48 PM

Anonymous The BabyMaker said...

It sets a terrible tone to have Kennelly do this as his political credibility is compromised by how he behaves.He was sued in 2010 for a paternity action and he entered into a stipulation regarding acknowledging his baby later.On 8/19/11 the mother filed a motion into Court for Support,looking for child support.

September 28, 2011 at 2:08 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't know if it's as much "WE REJECT YOUR SUPPORT." as much as it was "WE ARE SO OBLIVIOUS TO THE CONCEPT OF THE INTERNET AND BLOGS THAT WE HONESTLY THOUGHT WE COULD GET AWAY WITH THIS PATHETIC ATTEMPT TO SILENCE THE WORKING FAMILIES PARTY. OUR BAD."

Poor Democrats, now they actually have to campaign. Some, please get Kennedy a crash course.

September 28, 2011 at 2:32 PM

Anonymous Bruce Rubenstein said...

Be that as it may, most of us aren't fooled into thinking that the folks who rejected the cross endorsements wont secretly work for the republicans underground.My suggestion to the WFP and to real Democrats is to assume that Pedro and his allies will do what they can for the Republicans and YOU all do what you can for the WFP.

Many feminists,unions folks,minorities,LBGT folks and progressives within the city will tend to shy away from the 3 Democrats who foolishly took this endorsement anyway.

September 28, 2011 at 3:36 PM

Anonymous Mario Zapata said...

If it wasn't for this blog and Kevin's valiant efforts there wouldn't be any media coverage of Pedro's "handiwork" with he and McGarry orchestrating these cross endorsements.

One would think that at least Jenna Carlesso would have a front pager with the headline " controversy follows mayoral cross endorsements" or Ubinas would be weighing in with something.

The progressives and their base support of unions have been noticably M.I.A. as well.In years past there would be marches and demonstrations over these filthy cross endorsements.


Does anyone care anymore?

Will anyone care if and when Pedro and company move to strip away local labor and civil rights if and when they and their republican allies win the election?

September 28, 2011 at 3:47 PM

Anonymous peter brush said...

there would be marches and demonstrations over these filthy cross endorsements
----------------------------------
Yes, indeed. Those were the good old days when feminists,unions folks,minorities,LBGT folks and progressives would take off their bedroom slippers and march. They didn't complain, grumble or cry. Even when Mike McGarry and the Tea- baggers were turning the hoses on them, they didn't stop, they marched on... But, with this
"filthy cross-endorsement deal" our fine government schools are likely going to fail our minority students and the LBGT parades will no longer be allowed on Park Street.

September 29, 2011 at 7:16 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Marching in the street is complaining, grumbling, and crying. And when people have different viewpoints then you don't be childish and resort to derogatory name calling "teabaggers". Time to grow up and respect that this country allows people of all cultures to FREELY express themselfs.

September 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM

Anonymous peter brush said...

derogatory name calling "teabaggers"
-----------------------------------
I do believe you mistake my intentions, probably because of my clumsy facetiousness. It is I who as a conservative am called the name, even though it is a reference to a creative experiment in the sexual arts of which we Republicans, under the leadership of a noted homophobe, disapprove. I have seen it suggested that the guy who first directed the term at us tea party folks, Anderson Cooper, is himself G, if not B.
But, honestly, what specific issues turn, for better or worse, on the deal between Segarra and McGarry?

September 29, 2011 at 11:57 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot