What did you think the finding was going to be, after the nonsense by the Mayor and his cabinet the city wouldn't allow another black eye. Games and lies are still afoot at City Hall.
June 29, 2013 at 12:03 AM
Anonymous said...
It's obvious that Councilman Aponte is part of the clique of the untouchable Elite Group of corrupted Attorneys. The City has picked quite an interesting group. But like always, it doesn't matter what the Internal Audit Commission finds, nothing will be done, Just like the COO/CC Sandy Kee they made a ruling that she is working illegally,but she is still on board and double dipping. Who is responsible for following up with their findings; are they there just for appearance to keep them employed, no one seems to care what the IAC says anyways.
June 30, 2013 at 11:05 AM
Anonymous said...
Very interesting post Going to be interested to see what happens with this
July 2, 2013 at 4:15 AM
Below is the final version of the Internal Audit Department's review of the Ethics complaint made against Councilman Alexander Aponte. The report was completed in regards to Aponte's voting related to the SAMA land deal at 95 Park Street
The City Ethics Commission has scheduled a hearing on the matter for July 9, 2013.
Aponte Iac Review. The hearing is open to the public.
posted by KEVIN BROOKMAN at 5:13 PM on Jun 27, 2013
"INTERNAL AUDIT COMMISSION MAKES IT OFFICIAL: APONTE ALLEGED ETHICS VIOLATION"
3 Comments -
What did you think the finding was going to be, after the nonsense by the Mayor and his cabinet the city wouldn't allow another black eye. Games and lies are still afoot at City Hall.
June 29, 2013 at 12:03 AM
It's obvious that Councilman Aponte is part of the clique of the untouchable Elite Group of corrupted Attorneys. The City has picked quite an interesting group. But like always, it doesn't matter what the Internal Audit Commission finds, nothing will be done, Just like the COO/CC Sandy Kee they made a ruling that she is working illegally,but she is still on board and double dipping. Who is responsible for following up with their findings; are they there just for appearance to keep them employed, no one seems to care what the IAC says anyways.
June 30, 2013 at 11:05 AM
Very interesting post Going to be interested to see what happens with this
July 2, 2013 at 4:15 AM