Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: "WE THE PEOPLE"

"MY RESPONSE TO A COUPLE OF "ANONYMOUS" COMMENTS, RESPONSE #1"

6 Comments -

1 – 6 of 6
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kevin,

I have always been puzzled about why you haven’t ever come clean with the internet public about the fact Eddie Perez rescued you from being foreclosed on your former Jefferson Street home (138 I think) back in 1999. When your alarm business was going under he arranged for you to get a loan from HEDCO to save your home and business. You have always lived off the generosity/resources of others. Your holier than thou rap doesn’t cut it.

March 6, 2010 at 11:07 PM

Blogger KEVIN BROOKMAN said...

Unlike you, I try to get my facts straight before I post them here, In 1999 Mike Peters was Mayor, and yes I moved back to Hartford and purchased the building, at Mayor Mike's urging. At that time I felt Hartford was going in the right direction. Perez had nothing to do with that.

As for my business "going under" I am in my 22nd year in business. Under Perez, I should have probably moved out of Hartford and improved my profitability, but I choose to stay here.

About the only thing you did get right was the address. Another proud accomplishment for Perez, a building that won awards when I occupied it to an unsightly boarded up eyesore now.

Good job Eddie

March 7, 2010 at 9:23 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Brookman, I asked the question. Thank you for going into detail as to the current allegations on "rosie."

March 7, 2010 at 1:39 PM

Blogger KEVIN BROOKMAN said...

I hope the explanation made sense

March 7, 2010 at 3:27 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It makes sense. I guess I'm confused with the resolutions, particularly the vote of no confidence. Does it have to do with the Olga/Giles bruhaha you just explained or is it just a "last straw" type of thing? Keep in mind, I know you didn't put the resolution in, just asking your two cents.

March 7, 2010 at 8:56 PM

Blogger KEVIN BROOKMAN said...

My impression is that this has been brewing for a while. It has been a constant problem, but I think Rose's performance at the Kirkley-Bey/ Giles hearing and the $1000.00 FOI fine was the final straw to force the Council's hand. I doubt much will change because I don't think the votes are there to remove him, but I also think that the Council is starting to step up and do their job with their new leadership under Pres. Segarra

March 7, 2010 at 9:10 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot