Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Vigilance

"The Police Response to Occupy Wall Street"

3 Comments -

1 – 3 of 3
Anonymous Anonymous said...

OWS marches on Washington DC

November 20, 2011 12:54 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"it is apparent that the US has become a police state where free speech is punished harshly and assembly is simply forbidden"

actually, it's apparent that people in America have more freedom to speak and not conform than any society in the history of the world

the UC Davis situation sounds excessive but the authorities have tolerated the violation of reasonable rules, democratically determined, for use of the public parks and private property for a while in most places

I went down to walk around the encampment at McPherson Square a couple of weeks ago

I spoke with several of the protestors and one guy gave me a "We Shall Overcome" button

I asked what he wanted to overcome and he laughed, shrugged his shoulders and said "I don't know"

most of them were friendly although there were a few sketchy types

they've had their say, are welcome to come back and say it again and this has all been very amusing but the people deserve their park back

that would be the 99% who don't want their parks destroyed for the sake of something they don't even endorse

"I have no idea where this is going."

that's an understatement

"No political party is going to be able to assimilate the Occupy movement, both sides are equally invested in the model of economic inequality that puts the greatest amount of wealth in the hands of the fewest people, who then gain control over elected officials and consequently over government."

actually, the greatest amount of wealth in our society is in the hands of those who created our modern day paradise

"The problem is that democracy has been dissolved."

please

"I can't tell you what the solution to the problem is, powerful people with united, paramilitarized police forces serving them are not going to give up their advantage willfully. Elected officials are not going to pass legislation that offends their keepers. Do the American people have the guts to stand up for freedom?"

if you define freedom in a materialistic way, you are a Marxist

the main complaint of the OWS crowd seems to be: someone's rich and it's not me

November 21, 2011 1:30 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everyone has their own reason to join up with the Occupy movement, but the term that summarizes it is "economic injustice." Your cynical statement that those are people who are mad because they're not rich is childish.

It is not true at all that people have more freedom in this country than anywhere else, that is a cliche from the official propaganda of our government and it is a lie. How long has Bradley Manning been in prison? He has not been charged with a crime and he has been locked up since May 2010.

Places like the Heritage Foundation define "freedom" in terms of corporate nonregulation, which is absurd. Most of us think of the word in terms of personal freedom, the right to behave in ways that others might find objectionable. In this "see something say something" world, conformity is enforced by law, "freee speech zones" are created by police and put where the person who shoud hear the protesters won't be bothered by them, and people shrug off police violence against innocent citizens.

November 21, 2011 2:15 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot