Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Vigilance

"The Nightmare We Are Waking Up From"

15 Comments -

1 – 15 of 15
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Andrea-not anon
My favorite phrase these days- well, you know
Prsident Barack Hussein Obama! and I'll add Vice President Joseph Biden.

Did anyone hear that the reason Cheney was in the wheelchair at the inauguration is that he was getting ready to shed his human form and could no longer stand upright?

January 25, 2009 5:02 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Washington
Post is not too jazzed about the Obama performance so far:

"some in Congress and the new administration apparently see the country's present recession as an opportunity to change the federal government's spending priorities more generally or simply to reward loyal political constituencies.....it's risky to make new, multiyear commitments in the middle of a crisis without debate over competing priorities -- and without paying for them through some means other than borrowing.

Helping hire, equip and pay police, a $4 billion item under the bill, might be a good idea, but writing checks to individual households for the same amount would do more to stimulate the economy. Ditto for $16 billion in Pell Grants for college students, $2.1 billion for Head Start and $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts. All of those ideas may have merit, but why do they belong in an emergency measure aimed to kick-start the economy? For sheer irrationality, it would be hard to top the $4.19 billion the bill would give to the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, on top of $4 billion authorized last year. This program gives local governments money to buy and rehabilitate homes that have been foreclosed on -- thus giving lenders an incentive to foreclose on more houses.

Much of the stimulus bill does not really claim to deliver a short-term boost to the economy. Provisions to develop a "smart grid" for electricity and to enhance scientific research, alternative energy development and education seek to boost the economy's long-term efficiency, and, hence, its capacity to grow. We are sympathetic to the objective, and there might be much to recommend each of the various proposals. But given their cost, and the inherent difficulty of forecasting their impact, Congress should vet them through the normal legislative process, weigh them against other priorities and pay for them.

Fiscal stimulus is far from a sure-fire remedy. Economists disagree about the efficacy of every pump-priming effort from the New Deal to last year's tax rebates. In general, fiscal policy had fallen out of favor in economics; monetary policy, orchestrated by the Federal Reserve, is considered more efficient. Many economists note Japan's failed attempt to borrow and spend its way out of a recession during the 1990s. That country would have been better off, they say, if government had moved swiftly to recapitalize its banks instead of attempting repeated stimulus packages. As it is, Japan piled up a massive debt and recovered only modestly, leaving it vulnerable to today's downturn.

Fiscal policy is enjoying a political and intellectual comeback but in large part because the government is running out of alternatives; the Fed has already cut interest rates to zero and pumped its balance sheet up to more than $2 trillion. So legislators face a dilemma: They are being told that the stimulus package must be huge to work, but there may be no way to spend so much money quickly and effectively. Given the limitations, Congress and the administration would be well advised to trim the stimulus bill's more dubious spending, or reallocate it and focus on a definitive financial sector cleanup. Fiscal stimulus can be a part of the solution, but only if it is "targeted, timely and temporary." The efforts so far don't quite match that description."

January 25, 2009 11:05 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some historical perspective:

"Killing of Armenians in Turkey by the Turks, 1915: 1,5000,000 dead

Killing of the Chinese by the Japan, 1938: 300,000 dead

Nazi Holocaust, Adolf Hitler, 1940s: 6,000,000 dead

Soviet Political Killings, USSR, 1930s-1970s: 20,000,000 dead

Bosnian Conflict, 1994: 200,000 dead

Rwanda, 1994: 800,000 dead

Darfur, 2002-present: 300,000 dead

Roe v. Wade, USA, 1973-2009, 93rd-111th Congress: 38,000,000 dead"

Obama needs to live up to his rhetoric and side with the weak and defenseless.

January 25, 2009 11:39 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check the first figure in your latest post, AnonBigot.
1, 5000,000 is not a number.

As per usual, you get your stats from junk sources.

January 26, 2009 12:35 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

As usual, you miss the point, Derrick.

Everyone in Mexico still talking to you, Derrick?

Or did that minority who decided you're alright turn against you now that Obama has made it clear that he too will protect American interests abroad?

He bombed sites in Pakistan over the objection of their democratically elected leaders last week. I think Obama was right to do so but it's just the kind of thing foreign critics of Bush were always so supposedly livid about.

January 26, 2009 7:55 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Washington Post is not too jazzed about the Obama performance so far:

Sure it is. The Post likes "much" of the plan. You omitted the first paragraph of the commentary, which reads:

THERE IS much that makes sense in the $825 billion economic stimulus plan that the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives is developing, in close cooperation with President Obama's advisers. Several core features -- increased food stamps and unemployment benefits; Medicaid money for state governments; increased infrastructure spending; a tax rebate to low- and moderate-income families -- are either temporary measures that are well calculated to enable quick spending by families and businesses or that could be amended to become so.

January 26, 2009 8:28 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

You missed the point, Bea. While acknowledging that there are some stimulus aspects to the bill, the Post is chagrined that Obama is confusing things by mixing up all kinds of other priorities that should be deliberated carefully rather than rushed through, as the stimulus package should be.

Most economists believe our economy needs 825 billion in stimulus not 300 billion in stimulus and 425 billion in liberal agenda funding.

Unfortunately, we're starting to see signs of politics as usual.

TTF's got their chunk, btw. Obama's proposal includes 325 million for distributing free condoms.

Don't forget that Obama has now broken his promise of a 4K tax credit for college tution. He reduced that to 2.5K, not because of new economic reality, he's spennding a trillion, for heaven's sake. He did it because he has different priorities now. The next election isn't for four years.

He has a history of this kind of thing. Remember when he opposed NAFTA while campaigning in the Rust Belt and then he went to Canada and told their leaders in private that he was just saying that for political reasons?

January 26, 2009 9:28 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Andrea- not anon
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA!

January 26, 2009 9:47 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

A GUY SPENDING HIS POLITICAL CAPITAL PRETTY FAST!

He had an approval rating of 80% on inauguration day, like most new presidents.

He's losing luster faster than most.

By the end of the week, it was down to 67%.

That might be a record for three days!

January 26, 2009 10:20 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama is confusing things by mixing up all kinds of other priorities that should be deliberated carefully rather than rushed through, as the stimulus package should be.

At least the Obama Administration will allow members of Congress to read it before they vote on it, unlike the sweeping Patriot Act pushed through by the Bush Administration, portions of which have been struck down as unconstitutional.

Obama's proposal includes 325 million for distributing free condoms.

In 1986, C. Everett Koop, Reagan's Surgeon General, also called for the distribution of condoms and for teaching comprehensive sex education in our public schools to help slow the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

Have you checked the GOP poll numbers lately? We notice you skipped reporting those.

January 26, 2009 10:41 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum recognizes 12,000,000 victims of the Holocaust, 6,000,000 of whom were Jews. The remaining 6,000,000 included Jehovah's Witnesses, Sinti and Roma Gypsies, Polish and Russian civilians and prisoners of war, Homosexuals, political oponents of the regime, and those deemed "not worthy of life" (mentally or physically incapacitated individuals). These were all people who were selected to be identified, removed from the general population, and killed as a matter of Nazi policy and does not include the victims who were killed through war actions.
R.A.P.

January 26, 2009 11:06 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"At least the Obama Administration will allow members of Congress to read it before they vote on it, unlike the sweeping Patriot Act pushed through by the Bush Administration, portions of which have been struck down as unconstitutional."

Good, Bea. Shift focus.

That's how we know you have no argument to counter we what we're saying.

"Obama's proposal includes 325 million for distributing free condoms.

In 1986, C. Everett Koop, Reagan's Surgeon General, also called for the distribution of condoms and for teaching comprehensive sex education in our public schools to help slow the HIV/AIDS epidemic."

That was over 20 years ago. After two decades, it doesn't look like that helped.

"Have you checked the GOP poll numbers lately? We notice you skipped reporting those."

After 27 years of the Reagan era, there was bound to be a bad patch. The biggest problem was misunderstanding. In a few years, we will see a consensus develop that (1) the establishment of a Democratic and stable Iraq is a turning point in the war on terror and (2) that the economic meltdown was a result of Chinese currency manipulations, which America is weathering better than some of the highly regulated countries.

"The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum recognizes 12,000,000 victims of the Holocaust, 6,000,000 of whom were Jews. The remaining 6,000,000 included Jehovah's Witnesses, Sinti and Roma Gypsies, Polish and Russian civilians and prisoners of war, Homosexuals, political oponents of the regime, and those deemed "not worthy of life" (mentally or physically incapacitated individuals). These were all people who were selected to be identified, removed from the general population, and killed as a matter of Nazi policy and does not include the victims who were killed through war actions."

Thanks for correction. Still startling that legalized abortion has destroyed more than three times as many innocent lives since 1973 than Hitler did during the Holocaust.

January 26, 2009 11:29 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course everyone is talking to me, AnonBigot. I am a nice person, so why wouldn´t they?

They, the Mexicans, really don´t care about what the USA does with its country, but what they do care about is what the USA does with Mexico. So far, Obama has been striking down a lot of the Bush bigotry tactics, so Mexico remains happy with Obama.

January 26, 2009 1:44 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"At least the Obama Administration will allow members of Congress to read it before they vote on it, unlike the sweeping Patriot Act pushed through by the Bush Administration, portions of which have been struck down as unconstitutional."

Good, Bea. Shift focus.


The focus is on your quote from the Post:

"it's risky to make new, multiyear commitments in the middle of a crisis without debate over competing priorities."

You never once complained about the Patriot Act being rammed through Congress, not only without "debate over competing priorities" but without even knowing what was written in it. It's not a shift of focus, it's me pointing out your hypocrisy.

That was over 20 years ago. After two decades, it doesn't look like that helped.

For someone who claims to have a broader base of knowledge than some, you are stunningly uninformed. Reagan and conservatives in Congress made sure money was never appropriated for condoms, a CDC recommended HIV/AIDS preventive tool to be distributed. Here's how it went down. Koop made his scientific report on HIV/AIDS and called for comprehensive sex education and the distribution of condoms. Reagan did call for increased education campaigns, saying that "education is critical to clearing up the fears" surrounding AIDS, and issued a "denunciation of discrimination," saying, "This is a battle against disease, not against our fellow Americans." But he added that "AIDS education, or any aspect of sex education, will not be value-neutral," and drew "hissing" when he said, "Final judgement is up to God." (Condon, San Diego Union Tribune, 6/1/87). In all, Reagan's proposals were criticized as doing "almost nothing to stop AIDS" (Pike, Newsday, 6/10/87) Reagan never asked Congress to appropriate one red cent for the distribution of condoms so there was no "two decades" of condom distribution for you to complain about.

Your prediction about Iraq will turn out as wrong as your prediction of President Huckabee, et al, and your explanation of the cause of the world-wide recession is as inaccurate as your notion that condoms have been widely distributed since Koop called for them to be in 1986.

January 26, 2009 2:06 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

As I new to this topic I could find no mistakes or any missing elements.Its just had a good read and I feel Informations are also good.

March 20, 2009 4:24 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot