Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Vigilance

"The Three Million Year Old Girl"

8 Comments -

1 – 8 of 8
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Scientists are still painstakingly extracting the fossilized bones from the surrounding stone, but they have already made striking discoveries, dramatically reinforcing the idea that the creatures were a transitional stage between apes and humans. Although they had legs like humans that enabled them to walk upright on two feet, they also had shoulders like gorillas that may have enabled them to climb trees; although their teeth seem to have grown quickly, like chimps' teeth, their brains may have matured more slowly, like those of humans.

"This confirms the idea that human evolution was not some straight line going from ape to human," said Rick Potts of the Smithsonian Institution. "The more we discover, the more we realize that different parts evolve at different times, and some of these experiments of early evolution had a combination of humanlike and apelike features."


Do you think Ann Coulter will be revising her book to account for this new data Theresa?

September 22, 2006 4:15 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well some brains mature more slowly than others. you can not do much about that but be tolerant. lord knows that are always asking us to be tolerant. but how do we know this was a human any DNA found. if the DNA does not fit you must Acquit

September 22, 2006 6:19 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

And if the DNA does fit

Then you must admit

There is a strong relationship

NIH News
Nationa Institutes of Health

WASHINGTON, Wed., Aug. 31, 2005 - The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today...

September 22, 2006 11:29 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.genome.gov/15515096

September 22, 2006 11:34 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today..."

Actually, the DNA of all living things is remarkably similar. Makes one think there must be a common designer.

September 23, 2006 5:28 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Do you think Ann Coulter will be revising her book to account for this new data Theresa?"

Maybe when they actually discover something- like a time sequence. Every discovery they make confuses things more. This latest discovery was not a new species or group but simply from a time long before it was supposed to exist.

September 23, 2006 5:32 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Actually, the DNA of all living things is remarkably similar. Makes one think there must be a common designer."

All living things? Do wheat plants and pigs share DNA, Anon? Actually, the DNA evidence cited by the Genome group demonstrates that there must be a common ancestor for man and chimp. Had a designer designed each of them independently, they'd each have their own unique DNA.

September 23, 2006 9:05 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Let us first of all take the matter of "the similarity between human and chimpanzee DNA." The latest studies on this issue have revealed that evolutionist propaganda about a "98 %" or "99 %" similarity between man and chimp is totally erroneous.

If a slightly wider study is made of this subject, it can be seen that the DNA of much more surprising creatures resembles that of man. One of these similarities is between man and worms of the nematode phylum. For example, genetic analyses published in New Scientist have revealed that "nearly 75% of human genes have some counterpart in nematodes-millimeter-long soil-dwelling worms."292 This definitely does not mean that there is only a 25% difference between man and these worms! According to the family tree made by evolutionists, the Chordata phylum, in which man is included, and the Nematoda phylum were different to each other even 530 million years ago.

This situation clearly reveals that the similarity between the DNA strands of these two different categories of life is no evidence for the claim that these creatures evolved from a common ancestor."

September 24, 2006 12:48 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot