Mga app ng Google
Pangunahing menu

Post a Comment On: Steve Sailer: iSteve

"The Farrakhan Issue: It's always all about the Jews"

22 Comments -

1 – 22 of 22
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Funny thing is I think Farrakhan is partly jewish. He was also a musician and can play the violin. In fact he kind of reminds me of Reinhard Heydrich, another musician who had suspected jewish ancestry.

2/27/08, 2:10 PM

Anonymous simon newman said...

"Obviously, Obama holds no particular animus against Jews" - I'm not sure how you can be sure of that. Black nationalism is so strongly anti-Jewish, it would hardly be surprising if he'd internalised some of those views. Really though I don't know how we can be sure of anything about Obama. He's deliberately spent his life maintaining himself as an unknown quantity.

2/27/08, 2:15 PM

Blogger whiskey_199 said...

Obama as a Black Nationalist very likely despise Jews. His pals Wright and Farrakhan sure do!

But his national security policy is idiotic and stupid (and also driven by Black Nationalism).

The LAST thing Obama wants is any threat to his massive Welfare State for various anti-White groups. So he'll cut defense to European levels. Euros can do that because Uncle Sam picks up the tab. The US can't -- but Obama wants his massive Welfare State.

And the last thing he wants is White Engineers and the companies employing them making ships, planes, missiles, missile defense, etc. That's the Budget End.

On Iraq he wants to pull out and get a big old defeat (just because) while saying he'll put people in Afghanistan (which he won't). Right when the new Pakistani Govt. is talking about cutting off logistics (most supply is trucked through Pakistan).

But then Obama's weakness is his Alinsky-model "hate America" and hatred for things ordinary white Americans love: Patriotism, the Flag, Defense Spending AKA White Engineer full employment act, and most of all WINS for American military.

That's his Alinsky-weakness. Can't connect with Joe Average White Guy.

His Anti-Semitism though can be an important signaling process to Joe Average White Guy. If he's viewed as anti-Semitic that brings on a host of other attributes described above. So it's useful for people who are not Jewish to judge him on that.

2/27/08, 5:13 PM

Anonymous anony-mouse said...

1/ The difference here is that while Farrakhan is anti-White in a very weird way (i.e 'Doctor Yakub' inventing whites in his lab) his anti-semitism is pretty similar to other anti-semites.

Also there hasn't been a huge slaughter of Whites by non-Whites for some time now I believe.

2/27/08, 6:39 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Amazing that the Zionist New Republic magazine would denounce Ron Paul for receiving a virtually anonymous donation from a fringe figure that has never been heard of, but when Farrakhan endorses Obama, it is simply a non-issue, not only for the people at TNR, but for the rest of the so-called “mainstream” media.

But it gets worse, as now the Tennessee Republican party has issued a statement questioning whether “Barack Hussein Obama” will defend the state of Israel. One would think that the policies regarding defending the United States and its Constitution would be the primary question to put to a candidate for the Presidency of the USA, but that would only be an issue if the citizens of the historic nation-state were permitted to defend their interests and thus the interests of their homeland. And that simply isn’t the case anymore.

2/27/08, 7:47 PM

Blogger Born Again Democrat said...

People on the right are starting to get really unhinged over Obama.

The notion that once elected he is suddenly going to "reveal his true self" is pretty far-fetched to say the least. Get a grip.

2/27/08, 8:03 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"letting them take over his foreign policy"
Steve, that sounds like Walt and Mearsheimer. But then if you like Obama's stated foreign policy you probably agree with them.

2/27/08, 9:23 PM

Blogger mnuez said...

Steve, I agree with you that's far too often "all about the Jews". I'm entirely against having a mini Abraham-Foxman stand at the mouth of every single gentile on Earth waiting to see what words or thoughts of his should be trumpeted through the media as disallowed and allegedly anti-semitic. I'm for free-thought and free speech and, as a Jew, I feel no more secure from murderous anti-semitism knowing that there are a thousand Abe Foxmans out there acting like asses and pissing everyone off in my name. Beyond this however I believe that not only does "the Jewish question" get babbled about too often but that it often does so at the expense of real issues that need discussing. On account of my general disgust with practically every single presidential candidate of the past quarter-century, I have no great fascination with Obama and I therefore can't comment as to whether I believe that investigating allegations of anti-whiteness among his colleagues is all too important. In line however with the complaint that you're making in this regard, I'd like to point to the example of Mel Gibson.

When the ugly piece of human filth known as "Mel Gibson" was arrested for drunk driving he spewed forth a great deal of drivel from his oral cavity. Some of it had to do with Jews and I do believe that to be newsworthy. What was far far more newsworthy however was his threat to the cop that he'd use all of his wealth to destroy the cop's life should he dare to arrest him. Mel's outburst could have brought to the fore the fact that rich people regularly get away with murder in this country while poor people regularly get fucked for crimes they didn't commit. Mel's belief that his wealth could buy him a few get-out-of-jail-free cards was no an illogical belief. His threat to the cop was not an irrational threat. The fact that money can buy influence, favors, excellent lawyers and excellent harassment of enemies is something that the media could and should (but of course never would) have focused on with regards to Mel's harangue. Rather, unfortunately, it became (yet again) "all about the Jews" - to the detriment of all, particularly the Jews (not because we're generally impoverished but rather on account of the enforced censorship regarding us [as well as with regards to blacks, gays, etc.] generally pissing people off - or so I imagine it does).

mnuez
www.mnuez.blogspot.com

2/27/08, 10:12 PM

Anonymous Reg Cæsar said...

There already exists a word for "anti-whitism": leukophobia. However, it's mainly been used literally. There are poor souls who fear the color white in any form.

But it might be adaptable to the loathing of white folks. Leukanthrophobia, or perhaps leukotophobia, the modern Greek for "white person" being leukos.

Can any classicists be of help here?

2/27/08, 10:59 PM

Blogger Ron Guhname said...

"The notion that once elected he is suddenly going to "reveal his true self" is pretty far-fetched to say the least."

So you think he has shown us his real self? If so, please enlighten us because I can't make heads or tails of it.

2/27/08, 11:00 PM

Anonymous Dave David said...

But, of course, the entire fairly lengthy discussion was approached purely from the standpoint of Farrakhan's anti-Semitism rather than from his more general anti-whiteism...These days, anti-Semitism is absolutely disqualifying, but anti-whitism...is not worth mentioning.

None other than Karl Rove pounded Farrakhan's anti-white racism on Hannity & Colmes tonight 2.27.08. You can probably find the transcript on the foxnews web site.

Rove must be an iSteve reader because he specifically criticized the tunnel vision media emphasis on "anti-semitism" and shouted out that Farrakhan's message must be righteously denigrated as anti-white. Rove was very specific in his argument. I could hardly believe what I was hearing.

Incredible as it sounds, Rove has apparently woken up to the dangers posed by the monster he helped to validate. By the way, the monster is post-racial universalism for whites only. After all, Rove's children are going to have to live under the monster's shadow.

Just like yours, Steve.

2/27/08, 11:16 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

As much as Obama tries to unify, there are a few people that try to divide. The Jewish community needs to stop witch hunts for anti-semites. Life for the Jewish Community in America has never been safer,they have never had more power, or more wealth. They dont qualify as disenfranchised minorties that need special protection anymore. Jews are simply to successful to bother hunting down every person who talks about them. In reality your better of being Jewish than a white protestant male statisticaly. They need to stop complaining its annoying.
This denouncing game is silly and it needs to stop. If anything it creates resentment toward Jewish influence and its use of fear and intimidation to silience people who critisize Israel.

2/27/08, 11:16 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rove only wants to win elections, he couldn't care less about white group interests. If he did, he would use his influence to push for a pro-white immigration policy.

2/28/08, 12:46 AM

Anonymous TH said...

When the ugly piece of human filth known as "Mel Gibson" was arrested for drunk driving he spewed forth a great deal of drivel from his oral cavity.

How is Mel Gibson an "ugly piece of human filth", mnuez? I don't particularly care for his movies, but he seems to be a decent guy and good at what he's doing (i.e. making crowd-pleasing movies and money). He may have inherited some anti-Semitic beliefs from his father, but, really, if there's one person who can legitimately claim that there's a Jewish conspiracy against him, it's Mel Gibson.

Months before the release of "The Passion of the Christ", some (Jewish) people launched a world-wide campaign against Gibson and the film, claiming that it was anti-Semitic and even that it would instigate pogroms against Jews. Apparently many Hollywood bigwigs also vowed to never work with Gibson again because of the film.

Of course, all the vitriol against Gibson's film was baseless. Steve put it aptly: "[...] fifty million people have seen "The Passion" and, instead of anti-Semitic attacks, the most notable incidents have been repentant sinners confessing to previously unsolved crimes."

So I think it's understandable if a drunk Gibson blathers about Jewish conspiracies.

2/28/08, 3:58 AM

Anonymous braindead said...

mnuez sed:

"When the ugly piece of human filth known as "Mel Gibson""

I was sorry to read you wrote that. Before I enjoyed your comments, but obviously this comes from a strong anti-Christian angle. Too bad.

2/28/08, 7:53 AM

Anonymous Star Crossed Lover said...

That's some deep stuff, mnuez. Shovel it up on your way out.

2/28/08, 8:42 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I bet that, as I write this, a lot of our neocon / neolib friends are busy thinking up ways for Obama to prove he’s not an anti-Semite ... such as by hiring them as advisors and letting them take over his foreign policy."

I can't stand Glenn Beck, but I chanced upon him in a brief interview with David Frum, while channel surfing a few nights ago. Beck seemed utterly bemused by what appeared to be a somewhat dazed Frum, waxing lyrical about Obama's connection with Americans who are tired of being Americans, and want to be "citizens of the world." Beck finally just cut Frum off, but Frum certainly sounded as if he was angling for a job, if he isn't already in the bag.

2/28/08, 11:23 AM

Anonymous Proofreader said...

Bottom line: don't mess up with the Jews!
Obama's gonna get the Dinkins treatment.

2/28/08, 2:21 PM

Anonymous David Davenport said...

Oh, you people are Hillary's surrogates!

MIDDLE EAST
Good for the Jews?

Hillary Clinton's surrogates are questioning Obama's commitment to U.S.-Israel relations.

By Michael Hirsh and Dan Ephron | NEWSWEEK
Mar 3, 2008 Issue


The comment seemed like a casual aside. Ann Lewis, a senior adviser to Hillary Clinton, was touting the New York senator's strong support for Israel during a conference call in January with leaders of major American Jewish organizations. During the call, Lewis energetically contrasted Clinton's pro-Israel credentials with those of Barack Obama. To make her point, she said that Obama's "chief foreign-policy adviser" is Zbigniew Brzezinski, says one participant who would talk about the call only if he were not identified.

Brzezinski—the former national-security adviser to Jimmy Carter—is not Obama's "chief foreign-policy adviser." That is the job of a triumvirate who once worked for Bill Clinton: Anthony Lake, Susan Rice and Greg Craig. But Brzezinski, who tells NEWSWEEK he has advised Obama "only on occasion," has a reputation that is close to toxic in the American Jewish community. "When Brzezinski's name appears on an advisory list, that's a red flag right away," says an influential American Jewish leader who did not want to sour relations with the Obama campaign. Many American Jews mistrust Brzezinski because he endorsed a 2006 article, later a book, called "The Israel Lobby," which blames many U.S. foreign-policy problems on Washington's ties to Israel.

...

In one case, Daphna Ziman, a longtime friend of Hillary Clinton's who has co-chaired several events for her, forwarded an e-mail from the Republican Jewish Coalition, a grass-roots GOP group, criticizing Obama for proposing a Muslim summit. In a Jan. 31 interview with Paris Match, Obama said he wanted "an honest discussion about ways to bridge the gap that grows between Muslims and the West." Ziman, in her Feb. 2 e-mail, responded, "I am horrified at Mr. Obama's point of view." Her e-mail, sent to a group including Mike Medavoy, a Hollywood producer who supports Obama, contained a press release from RJC executive director Matt Brooks. "Nowhere in the Paris Match article does Senator Obama affirm Israel's right to exist," Brooks wrote. (Ziman says "the campaign had nothing to do with" her e-mail.)

In an e-mail sent Feb. 4—a day before Super Tuesday—Clinton finance official Annie Totah passed along a critical essay by Ed Lasky, a conservative blogger whose own anti-Obama e-mails have circulated in the U.S. Jewish community. Totah wrote: "Please read the attached important and very disturbing article on Barak Obama. Please vote wisely in the Primaries." (She didn't respond to a request for comment.)

The Obama-ites have counterattacked, rounding up endorsements from stalwarts in the Jewish community. Almost unanimously, American Jewish leaders say Obama's voting record and public pronouncements paint him squarely as an Israel supporter. "Senators Clinton, Obama, McCain and Governor Huckabee have demonstrated their support for a strong U.S.-Israel relationship," AIPAC president Howard Friedman wrote to NEWSWEEK. (AIPAC says all three senators have strong congressional voting records on issues important to the U.S.-Israel relationship.) The few mainstream Jewish and Israeli figures who criticize Obama focus on his apparent willingness as president to talk to the Iranian regime. Danny Ayalon, Israel's former D.C. ambassador, says Iran would exploit Obama's gullibility and race ahead with a nuclear program. Hillary Clinton seems eager to remind voters of that argument.

© 2008 Newsweek, Inc.


http://www.newsweek.com/id/114723

2/28/08, 5:18 PM

Anonymous David said...

to sum up, we see Obama working harder to distance himself from Zbigniew Brzeziński than from Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.

Just as the neocons would have it. The motherland - Israel - first, last, and always.

2/28/08, 8:19 PM

Anonymous Svigor said...

Rove must be an iSteve reader because he specifically criticized the tunnel vision media emphasis on "anti-semitism" and shouted out that Farrakhan's message must be righteously denigrated as anti-white. Rove was very specific in his argument. I could hardly believe what I was hearing.

That is astonishing. Keep in mind Rove is no doubt laying the groundwork for a Republican strategy; he probably knows the anti-Semitic angle is a dead end and wants to go with what works. If nothing else, this sounds like a clear signal that the Republicans plan to pick up their ****s at some point.

Ironic, considering I'm starting to think that Obama might be a better prospect for racially aware whites than McAmnesty.

2/29/08, 11:32 AM

Anonymous Proofreader said...

It seems many WN's favour Obama over McCain. At least Jared Taylor does.

http://tinyurl.com/2k3hef

3/1/08, 3:52 AM

Comments are moderated, at whim.
You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL