Mga app ng Google
Pangunahing menu

Post a Comment On: Steve Sailer: iSteve

"NYT: "Wikipedia’s Sexism Toward Female Novelists""

32 Comments -

1 – 32 of 32
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm with the women on that. I'd be pissed.

4/24/13, 9:21 PM

Anonymous Auntie Analogue said...


Heh. Looks that that gol-durned Panopticon is on the blink again.

4/24/13, 9:23 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

And Steve wonders about the dearth of women in computer sciences, when a woman can clearly get more positive pub by whining about said dearth rather than mending or even comprehending it... This esteemed opinionator doesn't realize a database entry can belong in 2 or more categories if the query is structured accordingly. Nah, it's more likely a sexist plot. Full fathom five the collective reasoning capability of the U.S.A. lies.

4/24/13, 9:53 PM

Anonymous wikipedian on the sly said...

I'm gonna hit up her page right now and add the link about her newest project there.

4/24/13, 9:56 PM

Anonymous postprelapsarian said...

What's exactly a "prodigious postfeminist talent"? She is supposedly literary company w/ the woman who wrote the incest memoir. (That's certainly post-something)

4/24/13, 10:08 PM

Anonymous Orthodox said...

Better to be thought a retard than write an op-ed in the NYTimes and remove all doubt.

4/24/13, 11:14 PM

Anonymous wren said...

I am starting to learn that if I really want to know what is going on in the US, the paper of record is the Daily Mail Online.

;-)

4/24/13, 11:21 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/world-thinkers-2013/

Barf

4/24/13, 11:24 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This article is to journalism as Women's Studies is to college degrees.

4/25/13, 12:12 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/04/george-w-bush-tells-jeb-to-run-says-jeb-vs-hillary-would-make-fantastic-photo/

When Bush comes to love...

4/25/13, 12:15 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-2JsACs1pw

4/25/13, 12:45 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2313755/Chinese-mother-accused-killing-shopkeeper-squeezing-testicles-hard-died-shock.html#ixzz2RKCXWtlJ

battle grip of the tiger mother

4/25/13, 12:51 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/04/23/george_w_bush_legacy_it_s_not_all_bad.html?fb_ref=sm_fb_share_chunky_bottom

4/25/13, 12:54 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sure that if we all had longer, more unkempt neckbeards this decision would make vastly more sense to us.

4/25/13, 1:50 AM

Anonymous Happy goy said...

Amanda Filipacchi will undoubtedly find solace learning the Fed has eventually embraced diversity and is soon to be led by a woman, none other than Bill Gates' wife.

4/25/13, 2:48 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Damn, are patriarchal plot found out again! The only place safe for patriarchy is wife grabbing Chechnya

4/25/13, 4:10 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not familiar with her oeuvre. I'll hit the remaindered section at Barnes immediately!

4/25/13, 5:17 AM

Anonymous Indian Casino said...

Its all a plot to crush womens' lives for the benefit of men. These wicked men. Its just like when they give far more money for breast cancer than prostate cancer... uh, no wait, its like when they work harder than women to support their families and die earlier.... no wait, uh, its like when they wouldn't allow women in combat to protect womens' lives... no wait, its like when in the last century or so, so many more medical advances benefitted women more than men, that women who had a lower life expectancy ended up with a far higher one...no wait, its like when women are given less time for the same crime, no wait ....

4/25/13, 5:29 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Off topic. I find that my music collection has nothing by female vocalist. In my youth I attended two concerts by women. Linda Ronstadt and Dolly Parton. They both had the voice of angels, but I did not purchase one of their albums. I'm sorry. I'm not very interested in what most women write about.

4/25/13, 5:31 AM

Anonymous chucho said...

Pretty much every "published author" of Generation X/Y has created his (or her...) own Wikipedia page. Typically they are MFAs who published some obscure banality through a small university press or some other vanity establishment. Of course no one read or bought these works besides the author's immediate family. Perhaps the purge is due to this abuse, I don't know.

A fun exercise for iSteve readers is to take the year of your birth and look at the Wiki category for people born in that year. Invariably 80% of the entries are sports figures or B-list actors, but you'll definitely see a handful of these inconsequential MFA author/arts types there too.

4/25/13, 6:03 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

In the time it took to write this, this person could have gone on Wikipedia and reverted all the changes. She probably doesn't know how it works though.

4/25/13, 6:09 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

i love the line from Gilbert & Sullivan's mikado (a list of people to one day be executed)
"and that singular anomily the lady novelist, i don't think she'll be missed, i'm sure she won't be missed"

Was that a thought crime?

4/25/13, 6:44 AM

Anonymous Hunsdon said...

To quote George Takei, "Oh my."

4/25/13, 8:19 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

And yet two of the first five authors listed on the American Authors page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_novelists) are female:

Patricia Aakhus
Belle Kendrick Abbott

Megan Abbott is the ninth author listed

4/25/13, 8:27 AM

Anonymous slumber_j said...

And here I thought the literary writers most likely to face discrimination were the ones who aren't publishing heiresses. Silly me.

4/25/13, 8:48 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Worst reading of a list ever.
Louisa May Alcott still listed under American Novelists.

4/25/13, 9:15 AM

Anonymous Svigor said...

I hate to break it to these broads, but Wikipedia is a free site that runs on donations, is maintained by volunteers (the vast majority of them men), and despite its great utility, really isn't all that organized.

If you don't believe me, go look at the pages for American States. There is no consistent template. Look at the demographic information; sometimes there's a separate demographics page, sometimes just a section, and sometimes crucial information like the state's percent black is omitted altogether. In sum, the articles are a mess.

American States. But these ladies expect the volunteer army to have their articles spit-shined?

4/25/13, 9:29 AM

Anonymous Anonyia said...

I don't understand why she doesn't just edit it. I do it all the time, mainly to update/add demographic statistics. Unfortunately most women think you aren't "allowed" to edit wikipedia. And how does she know it was men that altered the databases in the first place? Most men probably are not interested in editing the "American Women Novelists" section.

4/25/13, 1:52 PM

Anonymous Cail Corishev said...

Yeah, it'd be kinda funny if the page was created by a woman who thought it'd be neat for American Women Novelists to have their own page without any icky boys on it. They could decorate it with ribbons and glitter and stuff.

4/25/13, 3:56 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you put them in the American novelist category,t hey complain that their "achievements as women aren't highlighted enough", if you put them in the American Women Novelists category, they complain that they're being "gender-segregated".

I think the old-school response to this kind of silliness,"Shut up,b**ch", was probably the only one you can choose that doesn't leave you pounding your head against a desk wondering why you can't win.

4/25/13, 11:56 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I belong to an e-mail group of published female writers called WOM (it stands for Word of Mouth). Some of the members are extremely well known.

Really? Common!!

4/26/13, 7:38 PM

Anonymous Ray said...

"I don't understand why she doesn't just edit it. I do it all the time, mainly to update/add demographic statistics. Unfortunately most women think you aren't "allowed" to edit wikipedia. And how does she know it was men that altered the databases in the first place? Most men probably are not interested in editing the "American Women Novelists" section."

Who the hell can edit wikipedia? They've got bots that change everything back, and anal-retentive administrators who work on wikipedia in their parents' basements all day long who would block any edit.

4/27/13, 4:54 PM

Comments are moderated, at whim.
You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL