Mga app ng Google
Pangunahing menu

Post a Comment On: Steve Sailer: iSteve

"College coaches"

53 Comments -

1 – 53 of 53
Anonymous PSU is riotious for pedophile enablers said...

Victories for JoPa at PSU... 409

Years Sandusky coached for JoPa... 23

Years Sandusky ran/worked The Second Mile, a charity for children at risk... 30

Minimum years JoPa and the rest of PSU top admins covered for, financially donated to and enabled Sandusky and his "chariable" work with young boys at risk... 13

Indicted sex crime count... 40

Penn State ... No homophobia allowed!... PRICELESS

11/10/11, 6:32 PM

Anonymous Lickey Chatwoman said...

Is it harder, easier or the same difficulty level to sue for damanges or settlements in the case of homosexual vs heterosexual abuse and exploitation?

I image PSU, the local government/police and other individuals will be paying out many millions in settlements and lawsuits.

If a hetero male coach did to their players what this LSU lesbian coach did, how would the financial settlement and legal penalties be different? Are any affected LSU players reaching for the brass ring and suing?

11/10/11, 6:37 PM

Anonymous DAJ said...

The Penn State case concerns child rape, which ranks morally lower than homophobia in modern America. It is not a direct comparison to the LSU incident (sodomy with 10-yr old boys versus sex with 18-yr old adult women).

11/10/11, 6:45 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Let me say that I particularly like the editorial on page 4, where you speak of my being a sportsman. I am a thorough believer in vigorous manly out-door sports, but when they become, instead of a pastime, a permanent business, or whenever they interfere with serious work, then they are a sure sign of decadence."

Theodore Roosevelt"

11/10/11, 6:55 PM

Blogger Gilbert Ratchet said...

Erm... I'm not especially PC, but you do realize that homosexuality =! pedophilia, right?

11/10/11, 6:56 PM

Anonymous HL said...

Female coaches declining three percentage points is not a big change.

11/10/11, 6:59 PM

Blogger Truth said...

Stephen stop, Chapman carried on with ADULTS.

11/10/11, 7:16 PM

Blogger Assistant Village Idiot said...

Truth - yes, but in her case she was head coach, which adds a bit to the difficulty, as scholarships, playing time, etc, can be implied to be on the line.

Everyone sees their own pet cause in any big news event.

11/10/11, 7:42 PM

Anonymous Dregs said...

Non sequitor warning:

Steve, Derb has an article up at Taki about how Blacks may be particularly suited for politics.

I put in a good word for your 1996 NR article in the comments. FYI.

11/10/11, 7:43 PM

Blogger The Anti-Gnostic said...

It always cracks me up how the steely-eyed, a-religious, number-crunching Left just loses it when it comes to pattern recognition. Sandusky, for example, had six adopted kids. There is nothing in evolutionary biology that supports a heterosexual man voluntarily raising six of another man's spawn. But dare mention this, and the Left starts squawking, "Oh no he din't!"

It's like, if we dare accuse this one precious snowflake who's a member in turn of less than 5% of the population well, the next thing you know all the straight white guys are going to be stockpiling Zyklon-B.

11/10/11, 8:07 PM

Blogger Cult, -Cause. said...

No such worries about whether stories of Catholic pedophiles might encourage Catholophobia or whether stories redneck violence might lead to southern-white-male-phobia.

This is part of a pattern. When blacks get out of control, NY TIMES is less concerned about all-too-common black violence than about 'racist' perception about black criminality.

Same thing with Jews and Wall Street. When the likes of Madoff and Goldman Sachs fleeced this country, the worry among NY Times staff was less the abuse of power by financial Jews than 'antisemitic' perception that Jews were disproportionately involved in the fraud, scandal, and robbery.
And there was also the Omar Thorton outrage where the liberal Jewish spin at NY Times was "black victim of possible 'racism' just couldn't take it anymore and struck out at his tormentors."

Liberals have their set catetories of good peoples(Jews, blacks, gays, etc) and evil peoples(white conservatives, white Christians, white nationalists, etc.) And so, when a story makes white people look bad, it's the absolute truth and emblematic of white evil. But when a story exposes evil on the part of Jews, blacks, or gays, we get spin about how we should NOT rush to judgment and must remind ourselves that the story isn't any shape or form indicative of the group as a whole.
So, it's perfectly okay to say there is a culture of pedophilia and code of silence within the Catholic Church(or Irish dominated police department), but it's not okay to say there may be endemic collusion, corruption, and abuse of power among Jews, blacks, and gays.

And of course, it was the same with commies. Historians tell us that it was wrong for McCarthy and his supporters to jump to conclusion about American communists and fellow-travelers. Such was pernicious 'red-baiting'.
But if anyone is associated with 'racism' or fascism, tear him down and smoke/root out all of his associates as well. Buchanan recently got in hot water for being interviewed by James Edwards. Obama can associate with the likes of Wright, but the burden of accountability falls on conservatives. If they call out on Obama's associations, they are guilty of 'paranoid red-baiting'.

And notice how the liberals try to cover up a lot of gay crimes by calling it 'pedophilia'. Though pedophilia is not the same thing as homosexuality, it's true enough that many pedophiles are gay men. There's hetero-pedophilia and homo-pedophilia(as well as bi-pedophilia), and so it is disingenuous to categorize pedophilia as something entirely distinct from other forms of sexuality. It is a subset of sexuality.

At this point, our culture is beyond ridiculous. At the library the other day, I saw this fat middle aged guy in a dress, wig, lipstick. One of those tranvestites. I suppose we should tolerate such people and let them be, but that's not enough for liberals. I'm supposed to see critters like him as normal and mentally healthy. But the guy is cracked. When we have to suppress our natural feelings and pretend that all these freaks are normal and sane, it's a new kind of Victorianism.

11/10/11, 8:14 PM

Blogger Cult, -Cause. said...

Of course, NY Times does have a legit point. We shouldn't jump to the hysterical conclusion that all or even most lesbians are sexual predators. They are not.

But for NY Times to bring up this issue when NO ONE HAS HAS BLAMED LESBIANS FOR WHAT WHATEVER HAPPENED AT PENN STATE, it's hysterical and paranoid on their part. Ny Times isn't so much covering the news spinning this issue to put conservatives on the moral defensive. Though most people, conservatives included, have been decent enough not to accuse all or most lesbians of being sexual predators, NY Times has no qualms about pre-emptively accusing many Americans as closet-'homophobes'.

Worse, the NY TIMES is hypocritical because it has no problem with painting all or most Texans or Arizonans or conservatives as subhuman neanderthal beasts when some rightwing nutjob does something crazy. Remember when that politician was shot in Arizona by Laughner(who wasn't even a conservative)? Right away, ALL CONSERVATIVES were blamed for the CULTURE OF VIOLENCE. And though Tea Party has been far more sane and peaceful than OCCUPY WALL STREET, Ny Times liberal Jews went out of their way to portray the TEA PARTY as a HATE movement.

I will dare say that even though not all Jews are liberal jerks, the majority of Jews do seem to share the NY Times mentality. Shame on the Jewish community.

11/10/11, 8:23 PM

Blogger Cult, -Cause. said...

We should NEVER rush to judgement, especially when it comes to college sports. We must be cautious, balanced, and judicious... like how liberals were with the Duke Lacrosse case.

11/10/11, 8:26 PM

Blogger Cult, -Cause. said...

The power of words. Gays didn't have much clout before they came up with 'homophobia' which was then disseminated all across America by the media and academia. And Jews have 'antisemite', and blacks have 'racist'. And there is 'xenophobe' to protect illegal aliens and massive out-of-control immigration.

Those words work as both shields and swords. They shield certain groups from criticism and are used to attack other groups for being hostile to the shielded groups.

There is no evil word associated with viciously attacking and undermining Christians, whites, and conservatives.
Such words must be created and disseminated far and wide.

Also, we need to come up with words to describe black thuggery, Jewish venality, and gay perversion. Words that sound 'scientific' and 'objective' but really stick it into them.

11/10/11, 8:37 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Come on, her name was Pokey!

What more do you need?

11/10/11, 8:38 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Come on, her name was Pokey!
What more do you need?"

Rotfl. And I would be a homopoke, not a 'homophobe'--a creature less likely to exist in the real world than fairies.
Homopoke is someone who pokes fun at gays. Why? Cuz they are funny.

11/10/11, 8:44 PM

Blogger Cult, -Cause. said...

The most amusing manner in which the media try to
pre-empt 'prejudice' on the part of the public when covering news stories of bad things done by minorities is having a black news reporter cover black crime.

Almost on every channel, you see a clean-cut yuppie-buppie black male or female reporter speaking proper English covering stories of non-blacks brutalized by black thugs.
So, if a white guy gets robbed or beaten by black thugs, there is the 'good clean cut' black news reporter to remind him(and us)that most blacks are decent and nice, just like him.
While it's true that not all blacks are thugs, this media trickery is getting ridiculous.

Wild blacks loot and burn down a city. Then we see a nice clean-cut black guy in front a news camera wondering, 'gee, what went wrong?' and fooling us that most blacks be just like him.

11/10/11, 8:50 PM

Blogger Anthony said...

Since when is there a stereotype that lesbians are predatory? Anyone who actually knows any lesbians is probably aware of the Lesbian Sheep Problem: put a bunch of interesting, attractive lesbians in a room for the evening, add alcohol, and they'll *still* all go home alone. That's the opposite of predatory.

11/10/11, 9:22 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I stand corrected on the age of the black "kid" in Epic Beard Man video. According to Know Your Meme, the black "kid," Michael, was 50 at the time of the incident. He only behaved and dressed like he was 17. He was still 17 years younger than Epic Beard Man.

11/10/11, 9:30 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This sort of reminds me of the western woman who decided to travel alone into the Islamic world in full wedding dress. To promote peace. A brave experiment if you will, with herself as the subject.

"Bacca's sister Maria Pasqualino told Italian reporters that her sister had intended to hitchhike across a total of 11 countries carrying her message of ''peace, hope and faith''."

Travelling west to east she only made it as far as Turkey before being raped and murdered.

Needless to say her supporters were keen that her story not inflame prejudice. An odd sort of experimnt you might think, let the results speak for themselves. But no, it turns out the experiemnt didnt count anymore.

11/10/11, 10:13 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The murdered Italian woman, forgot a link:

http://www.italymag.co.uk/italy/crime/shock-over-italian-peace-bride-murder-turkey

11/10/11, 10:15 PM

Anonymous ELVISNIXON.com said...

JOE PATERNO was forced out of Penn State after decades of excellence as the Nittany Lions Head Coach.

Why was "JoPa" fired? Because he allowed the weakest,most defenseless in our society are being allowed to be exploited for the degenerate pleasure of rich and powerful homosexuals.

Sandusky is a male and he forced young males to have sexual relations with him- that is by definition same-sex or homo(same) sexual. Why does our media mask the fact by calling him a "pedophile"? He engaged in homosexual pederasty.

What our media is hiding from you is the fact that Paterno was simply following the PC dogma- Paterno refused to be "HOMOPHOBIC" - after all Sandusky just did what LGBT media push- same sex sodomy.

Children in Kindergarten in California are now being forced to learn about homosexual "heroes"- by law. Why?

Homosexuals are using so-called "anti bullying" codes to impose pro homosexual propaganda in teh classroom.

"Gays" have already lowered the age of consent in Canada to 12 years old.

Sandusky is a protected "minority" as a "gay" man.

When homosexual predators start doing this in our post Obama military look for cases like this to increase exponentially.

This is highly reminiscent Ft Hood jihadi Nidal Hasan. The muslim murderer should have been removed from the Army years ago- but fear of being called "islamophobic" lead to those in authority willfully turning a blind eye to the potential for ghastly crimes. After all "Diversity is Strength" is the mantra that our media brainwashed us to believe.

Make no mistake- Harvey Milk himself marched in San Francisco's "Gay" parades along with NAMBLA ( North American Man Boy Love Association)

The fact that the homosexual Coach Sandusky was allowed to rape young boys for years and years is a statement about our societies refusal to face the facts about the "gay" agenda.

http://elvisnixon.com/2011/11/10/joe-paterno-and-nambla-the-gay-agenda.aspx

11/10/11, 10:43 PM

Anonymous Lugash said...

I am Lugash.

Interestingly, Rene Portland, the PSU women's basketball coach, was homophobic, or pretty close to it. She was quite open about not tolerating any lesbians on her team.

http://espn.go.com/espnw/commentary/7217890/sandusky-case-just-latest-penn-state-failings

I am Lugash.

11/10/11, 11:27 PM

Anonymous Lugash said...

I am Lugash.

Duh, duh, duh, read the post first.

I am Lugash.

11/10/11, 11:44 PM

Anonymous cosmotarian said...

I misread the name of Sandusky's foundation as the "Second Life Foundation." That was eerie because I started imagining Reason.com articles arguing for market-based simulation games allowing for people to molest virtual children. But I am sure before the end of the month we'll hear about what a rabid right-wing Republican this creep was--whether or not he was, we'll hear it, that is. Some pedophiles are more equal than others and within a day of the resignations the left was publicizing a pro-Sandusky comment Rick Santorum made a while back. It is weird in our minoritarian society that homosexual molesters are at maximum a mere phantom threat, but there's an American Beauty-style dad lurking in every halcyon suburb. Everyone's partly gay except for the rapists.

11/11/11, 1:34 AM

Anonymous posthuman future said...

I was reading on the Jon Last site where he was trying to argue immigration is a secondary issue to abortion (if I follow him correctly), saying the sex revolution is the glue of the 2011 Left. Despite disagreeing with his prima facie argument I tend to agree about the sex, although I think it will ultimately be self-damaging politically. Woody Allen or that Columbia prof can carry on with life mated to their daughters (in the latter case, his biological daughter) and despite losing some sneaker endorsements they're not paying for that. The prof had to plead guilty to incest I think, but do you imagine there will still be incest laws on the books in 20 years?

As Prof. Jack Gladney's son in White Noise said: "How is incest unnatural? Animals do it all the time" [I think "cannibalism" would have worked there too]

We're in minoritarian overdrive atm and I think it's going to explode. The boundaries of sex relations are boiling down to litigable artifacts. Predatory lesbians have to be extremely rare so why do we need to patch up the system for them? I mean, "fairness" is great, but what's in it for the 99%?

11/11/11, 1:48 AM

Anonymous CJ said...

Paging ElvisNixon.com:

The "age of consent" in Canada was lowered to 14 in the 1990s by the then Liberal Party federal government. It was raised back to 16 in 2008 by the present Conservative Party government.

Age of Consent to Sexual Activity (Department of Justice)

11/11/11, 1:51 AM

Anonymous dearieme said...

"Pokey Chatman": brilliant! You couldn't make it up.

11/11/11, 3:14 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why was "JoPa" fired? Because he allowed the weakest,most defenseless in our society are being allowed to be exploited for the degenerate pleasure of rich and powerful homosexuals.
One place that is protected: hollywood- pedophilia is rampant, from what i understand.

11/11/11, 3:47 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course, NY Times does have a legit point. We shouldn't jump to the hysterical conclusion
but the NYT encourages hysterical conclusions whenever its politically expedient

11/11/11, 3:49 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Gays" have already lowered the age of consent in Canada to 12 years old.
! any proof of this?

11/11/11, 5:07 AM

Anonymous The Jokes Write Themselves said...

Reactions also included the removal of Sandusky's image from a mural near the college, and the renaming of an ice-cream flavor which had been created in his honor.

11/11/11, 5:44 AM

Blogger njartist said...

Lugash: can you prove you are Lugash?

11/11/11, 5:49 AM

Blogger James Kabala said...

"Sandusky, for example, had six adopted kids. There is nothing in evolutionary biology that supports a heterosexual man voluntarily raising six of another man's spawn."

I guess we finally found one of the anti-adoption diehards Steve was talking about the other day. Probably he's right in this case, alas.

Cult-Cause - This article is four years old. Steve found it.

11/11/11, 6:31 AM

Anonymous Nanonymous said...

Gilbert Ratchet:
you do realize that homosexuality =! pedophilia, right?

Of course not but there surely is a very strong over-representation.
http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF08L46.pdf

11/11/11, 7:25 AM

Blogger Cult, -Cause. said...

"I am Lugash."

You are Lugash.

11/11/11, 7:40 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

From that ESPN article:

Meanwhile, when we examine the Portland era and the Sandusky scandal through the same lens, what we see tells us a lot about institutionalized hate and systems that equate winning with morality, both of which flourished for decades in State College. The administration's failure to step in and do the right thing, the moral thing, created a void in which dozens of young lives, from Portland's players to Sandusky's alleged victims, were disrupted and forever scarred.


Hmmm, it seems that the reporter thinks that being sexually abused is the moral equivalent of not being let on the team because you are gay.

In addition, responding to an earlier comment. In this new PC world we live in, homophobia is a far worse crime than sexually abusing a minor, and it seems as if sports journalists are carrying water for that morality as well,

11/11/11, 7:43 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

And notice how the liberals try to cover up a lot of gay crimes by calling it 'pedophilia'. Though pedophilia is not the same thing as homosexuality, it's true enough that many pedophiles are gay men. There's hetero-pedophilia and homo-pedophilia(as well as bi-pedophilia), and so it is disingenuous to categorize pedophilia as something entirely distinct from other forms of sexuality. It is a subset of sexuality.

What percent of pedophiles self identify as homosexuals?

Obviously, it isn't socially acceptable to self identify as a pedophile. So, some pedophiles who like boys are probably self identifying as just homosexual.

Also, due to different maturation rates, under age boys are more likely to be boys than underage girls are to still be girls. Probably 90% of 14 year old girls are physically fully mature, but less than 50% of 14 year old boys are. So a grown man lusting over a 14 year old girl doesn't seem to me to necessarily be a pedophile, but a grown man lusting for a 14 year old boy almost certainly is.

Once again trying to legally establish equality where is doesn't physically exist, doesn't work.

11/11/11, 8:41 AM

Anonymous Kylie said...

Are we all braced for the homophobic backlash?

11/11/11, 9:13 AM

Blogger Rev. Right said...

"Anthony said...
Since when is there a stereotype that lesbians are predatory? Anyone who actually knows any lesbians is probably aware of the Lesbian Sheep Problem: put a bunch of interesting, attractive lesbians in a room for the evening, add alcohol, and they'll *still* all go home alone. That's the opposite of predatory."

Actually, that sounds like the start of Penthouse Forum letter.

11/11/11, 11:58 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Homosexual activists have long sought to distance themselves from pedophiles, however Canada’s most prominent homosexual activist group has now demanded the lowering the age of consent for anal sex to 16 from 18. Surprisingly, Canada’s National Post, regarded by some as a ‘conservative’ paper has come out in favour of the proposal.

Reacting to the Conservative Government’s plan to raise the age of consent forÂnormal sex from 14 to 16, EGALE (Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere) has commenced a campaign to have the age of consent for anal sex lowered to 16 from 18. Laurie Arron, the director of advocacy for EGALE remarked to the Ottawa Citizen, “There’s no reason to treat anal sex differently than other sexual acts except to stigmatize gay and bisexual men.”

However, that statement is categorically false, speaking strictly from a medical standpoint. Even those who support homosexual sex acts warn nonetheless that anal sex is a dangerous activity, regardless of genders involved. The sex info site of the University of California at Santa Barbara, which can in no way be described as opposed to homosexual activity, nonetheless points out that anal sex is a dangerous practice.

Experts on sexual behaviour, or “sexperts” at the site refers to them, warn that anal sex is the most dangerous behaviour for transmission of HIV/AIDS and all other STDs since the anus is not designed for sexual activity as is the vagina. Moreover, the ‘sexperts’ warn that the practice also leads to fecal incontinence - loss of normal control of the sphincter muscles which leads to stool leaking from the rectum at unexpected times.

As the website puts it: “Even when people use lots of lubrication during anal sex, there can be tearing of the tissue inside the anus . . . For this reason, anal sex is the riskiest form of sexual activity when it comes to the transmission of HIV/AIDS.

“Tiny tears in the anal tissue are like giant superhighways for the HIV viruses, allowing them to get inside the body and enter the blood system. Anal tears provide an opening for all the other STDs as well.

“It may be possible for repetitive anal sex to lead to weakening of the anal sphincter, which is the muscle that tightens after we defecate. Once weakened, feces can escape the anus against our will.”
(see the website http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/?article=faq&refid=125 WARNING: graphic sketches used to illustrate)

Nevertheless, the National Post backed the EGALE request in an unsigned editorial Saturday February 11. The editorial titled, “Equalize the age of consent” said “Section 159 of the Criminal Code specifically bans anal intercourse between unmarried people under 18. This is plainly discriminatory, a prohibition intended to stigmatize homosexual or bisexual teenagers, suggesting that the nature of their sexual relationship requires special added protection. This is nonsense.”

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/editorialsletters/story.html?id=a2d82b6e-90bc-4b35-a48a-3938e0f4f699 )

11/11/11, 12:19 PM

Anonymous Kylie said...

"Since when is there a stereotype that lesbians are predatory? Anyone who actually knows any lesbians is probably aware of the Lesbian Sheep Problem: put a bunch of interesting, attractive lesbians in a room for the evening, add alcohol, and they'll *still* all go home alone. That's the opposite of predatory."

I've had several lesbians show an interest in me. (And no, I've never been to a gay bar, party or similar venue.)

Must be my ovine appearance which led them to mistake me for one of their own.

11/11/11, 4:06 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Since when is there a stereotype that lesbians are predatory? Anyone who actually knows any lesbians is probably aware of the Lesbian Sheep Problem: put a bunch of interesting, attractive lesbians in a room for the evening, add alcohol, and they'll *still* all go home alone. That's the opposite of predatory."

I was thinking the same thing. Where's an example of that stereotype? The only lesbo stereotypes I know of tend to have them as fairly neutral, the lumberjack shirt and shorts type.

In fact, I only know one lesbian joke, which actually contrasts their tendency to seek a relationship as opposed to a 'mo guy:

What does a lesbian bring to a second date?
- a U-Haul

What does a gay guy bring to a second date?
-what second date?

11/11/11, 4:09 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

just goes to show how, despite camille paglia's mention of her having rapey eyes ala rapacious men, poor lesbians are doomed to remain non-predatory by the harmful stereotype effect.(and suffer the consequent lack of action)

"The only lesbo stereotypes I know of tend to have them as fairly neutral, the lumberjack shirt and shorts type."

And effete gay men get classified as sexual monsters!?

Why is no one spreading more awareness about NAWGLA like south park did with NAMBLA?
Damn patriarchy, I tell you.

11/12/11, 9:11 AM

Anonymous not a hacker said...

I used to play pick-up ball at Cal with a black guy who was very homophobic. In '97 he got into an argument with the women's basketball coach, a lesbian, when her players overstayed their time on the court. She called him a "black bastard." She got fired, and he got $10K for his mental anguish.

11/12/11, 1:32 PM

Blogger Steve Sailer said...

The worm is turning in blacks v. homosexual disputes.

11/12/11, 1:34 PM

Anonymous genetically deficient said...

due to different maturation rates, under age boys are more likely to be boys than underage girls are to still be girls

What do you mean by maturation? Girls on average hit puberty first. It is argued endlessly about why, in Western countries, this happens (cultural, bad chemicals in groundwater, global warming, etc.)

I have not however seen any factual assertion that 90% of 14 year old girls are Full Grown (to say nothing of "50%" of same age boys)

11/12/11, 10:08 PM

Anonymous bloc partay said...

With IVF improvements will it be possible to create a permanent faction of lesbian-oriented? I only say this because the more genetically bent have a serious resistance to the old fashioned way. Also they have political cohesion and often dual-income households (though typically earning less than gay men). Denice Denton might have been the pathbreaker-- these lesbians could turn into our future natural leaders, provided the "straight" women are pushed out of the picture. Polygamy can help there.

11/13/11, 8:29 PM

Blogger David Davenport said...

Were these Penn State perpetrators raised Catholic? If it's OK for a priest ...

--Sorry, Steve.

11/13/11, 9:19 PM

Anonymous NOTA said...

bloc:

No higher technology than a turkey baster and an agreeable male friend is required. Lots of lesbian women can find those two.

11/13/11, 9:30 PM

Anonymous NOTA said...

As an aside, how fluid is your sexuality likely to be by the time you go off to college? Is it really likely your darling daughter is going to suddenly decide she's a lesbian when she gets onto the basketball team in college and meets the girl of her dreams?

11/13/11, 9:35 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, the power-status differential never turns that way (though within their age cohort lesbians-until-graduation are of course common, for a different reason). There's not much self-interest in or peer tolerance of sleeping with the lady coach. Also it arguably compromises straight daughters as the prime funding well of lib-arts colleges and pseudo-undergrad universities, which mostly provide a glorified dating service people in the '40s and '50s would have recognized.

Disproportionate gay clout is best understood as an upper middle class proxy jab at NAMs.

11/14/11, 1:24 AM

Anonymous Lez B Friends said...

Wasn't talking about the insemination/basting part. IVF & fetal screening for lesbian girl children is surely w/in 10-20 years away. This will make the abortion wars of the Clinton era seem like nothing.

11/14/11, 1:57 AM

Comments are moderated, at whim.
You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL