Mga app ng Google
Pangunahing menu

Post a Comment On: Steve Sailer: iSteve

"My Hudson Institute Presentation on the Hispanic Vote"

7 Comments -

1 – 7 of 7
Anonymous fifi said...

Alas, I have no bandwidth but the Powerpoint presentation was good. Very effective use of the Hugo Chavez pic, btw. Looking at this man's exterior tells you all you need to know about him - fascist bully!

12/6/07, 7:35 AM

Blogger Audacious Epigone said...

Bravo!

You seemed more comfortable than at the Levitt symposium.

Kate O'Beirne should know that, of the ten closest states in the '04 Presidential election, only two (New Mexico and Nevada) have Hispanic populations above the by-state national average. The other eight are less Hispanic and more white than the nation as a whole.

Top ten:

1. Wisonsin
2. Iowa
3. New Mexico
4. New Hampshire
5. Ohio
6. Pennsylvania
7. Nevada
8. Michigan
9. Minnesota
10. Oregon

12/6/07, 10:27 AM

Anonymous Hector said...

Steve, no offence, but you need to go on one of those image makeover shows. Else get tough by learning martial arts, like these bad asses.

12/6/07, 11:59 AM

Blogger John S. Bolton said...

I guess some of the displays were supposed to be read off as 'logic this ____ before'

12/6/07, 2:14 PM

Blogger ziel said...

That woman economist who debated Peter (I've forgotten her name already) must have been shell-shocked finding not a single sympathetic ear, and at the Hudson Institute no less, when no doubt during her every waking minute elsewhere everyone thinks just like her.

12/6/07, 6:40 PM

Anonymous turkey said...

Ethnic nostalgia check, economic obscurantism, check.

Immigration restrictionists need ground pounders that are happy to make the same points over and over in the face of the same vapid criticisms over and over, all in a warm, cooing tone.

12/6/07, 10:12 PM

Anonymous guest007 said...

I think the long term trend line graphs for Republican voters were probably generated before considering the impact of the incompetency, stupidity, and arrogance of the Bush Administration.

The almost total failure of the current Bush Administration has destroy many in the next generation of Republicans. No one who worked for the Bush Administration or on Capital Hill for Hastert or Frist has any future in politics.

Look at how many current Democratic leaders worked in the Clinton White House. Now look to see if anyone who worked for Bush will still be involved in politics in a few years.

The Bush Administraiton also destroyed conservative credibility on many issues that are generally considered conservatives. Can any Republican candidate talk about cutting government spending or limiting government after the Bush Administration?

12/7/07, 2:46 AM

Comments are moderated, at whim.
You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL