Mga app ng Google
Pangunahing menu

Post a Comment On: Steve Sailer: iSteve

"Pew Hispanic Center: Latino Electoral Tidal Wave MIA Yet Again"

11 Comments -

1 – 11 of 11
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And Israel is the 51st state?

Do either of these newcomer states contribute tax revenues to the US Federal Government, which subsidizes them both, although in different ways?

4/26/11, 9:50 PM

Blogger agnostic said...

Unfortunately this only shows that direct Latino influence won't be the tidal wave that their numbers would predict.

But as we see, for example, with the Southern Poverty Law Center, it's rarely the low-achieving NAM group itself that strikes the hardest blows.

Rather, it's moralistically preening whites (disproportionately Jews) who wage a crusade on behalf of the downtrodden, who provide a voice for the voiceless, etc.

If this was bad enough when the Hispanic population was smaller, it's only going to get worse as they grow, whether or not the Hispanics themselves make it worse by voting.

4/26/11, 11:46 PM

Anonymous slumber_j said...

"Hispanic." Will we ever tire of that fake concept?

4/27/11, 5:58 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

MIA now but they'll be coming home some time in the future.

4/27/11, 8:28 AM

Anonymous Thripshaw said...

Steve, could you write something about the gerrymandering taking place as a result of the 2010 census? The local papers here in NJ write about how new electoral districts must be carved out for Hispanics, due to their numerical increase.

Even when they are too lazy to vote, they still get special rotten boroughs (barrios?) to represent "the race."

This is zero-sum political dispossession of whites. I think it is also intellectually indefensible.

4/27/11, 9:18 AM

Anonymous Sgt. Joe Fridat said...

"...and Sen. Barbara Boxer (Calif.) were reelected last year with strong Latino support."

Um, that's actually not quite right.

Fiorina was a horrible candidate who had health issues and lacked the killer instinct necessary to go after Boxer, not to mention lingering suspicions about how much she really disagreed with Boxer on issues. Run a RINO against Boxer in a liberal state, and the result is utterly predictable.

4/27/11, 10:29 AM

Blogger Paul said...

This is EXACTLY what our Ruling Class had in mind when it set about replacing traditional Americans (black & white) with foreigners 45 years ago. It is even easier to rule a country when its citizens don't even TRY to vote you out.

4/27/11, 12:33 PM

Blogger Felix said...

This is EXACTLY what our Ruling Class had in mind when it set about replacing traditional Americans (black & white) with foreigners 45 years ago. It is even easier to rule a country when its citizens don't even TRY to vote you out.

It is? Does the ruling class get reincarnated, or something? Do they get to come back in another life and take advantage of this process that they began all these decades ago? Why would past and present ruling classes implement policies to benefit future ruling classes that will have little or nothing in common with them, either genetically or culturally?

The race replacement of whites IS an aim of the ruling class, or at least the forces which control the ruling class. But that's just becuase those guys just hate whites, period.

4/27/11, 1:21 PM

Blogger Paul said...

Why would past and present ruling classes implement policies to benefit future ruling classes that will have little or nothing in common with them, either genetically or culturally?

Do you seriously believe that the US Ruling Class reinvents itself every generation? Ivy League legacies? Bush family? Kennedy family?

4/27/11, 2:28 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The local papers here in NJ write about how new electoral districts must be carved out for Hispanics, due to their numerical increase.

Even when they are too lazy to vote, they still get special rotten boroughs (barrios?) to represent "the race."


So which is better? Carve outs that concentrate them? or integration which dilutes them? I can sort of see pluses and negatives either way. Some have suggested integration/dilution is better when carving up districts. In Texas, they do both depending on geography etc, and end up red.

4/27/11, 7:57 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The reason for this is probably related to what happened during the million mexican march. The powers that be decided to keep the mask on rather than getting overeager and showing Americans what is happening.

4/29/11, 1:53 PM

Comments are moderated, at whim.
You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL