Mga app ng Google
Pangunahing menu

Post a Comment On: Steve Sailer: iSteve

"Obama Administration cracking down on the border ... the Canadian border"

10 Comments -

1 – 10 of 10
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A joke for sure. The only problem is that they are serious.

3/30/09, 2:19 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The idea that somehow blue-eyes are symptomatic of a greedy-grasping nature is a new one on me.
In Germany, and i presume the rest of central europe, the term 'blue-eyed innocent' was in vogue.Traditionally, it was believed that blue-eyes were associated with a warm,naive, mild and trusting nature, whilst dark eyes - the natural pregotative of Asiatic types were held to be associated with ruthlessness and guile.
I don't know if Lula is aware of this and his rantings are a deliberate inversion or projection.

3/30/09, 3:17 AM

Blogger Ronduck said...

Too bad about the bottom two-thirds of the country, but that's not my problem."

And that's how they have behaved for the last 100 years. However, it will come back to bite them in the ass in the future. Michigan supported the Civil Rights movement in the mid to late 1960's under governor Romney and now all of its central cities in Flint, Detroit and other minor towns have been reduced to ashes, along with its economy. Massachusetts was the epicenter of the damn movement, has seen its industrial base disappear, its morality ruined since 1960, its priests shamed in front of the whole world, and its state is now beginning the long decline due to immigration that it has inflicted on other states.

Of course, once the large, harmful trends unleashed by these idiots comes home to roost, they still vote for continuing it. Michigan voted for Obama in 2008, despite having a major part of their population replaced by Arabs, and their cities ruined by homicidal Blacks, the Whites there still couldn't vote for McCain.

3/30/09, 9:29 AM

Anonymous Varangian said...

Interesting quote a few posts back:

"The Schiffs, notorious Canadians, funded the Bolsheviks. Most of the top staff of the KGB were Canadians."

You could figure the Bronfmans into this contemporarily.

Yep, let's see if they use Homeland Security to keep out those types of 'Canadians' indeed!

3/30/09, 11:07 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have made the comment in the past that the problem with bureaucrats is that they like to push around easy targets. Why bust up the Gang stronghold, when you can bust the complaining Citizen for not shoveling his walk? I mean, people could get killed by gangmembers, but John Q Homeowner, what is he gonna do?

It seems americans have a real problem with a porous border, but other than some marijuana from BC, I don't think the Canadian one is the problem....

3/30/09, 2:04 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Um- a special forces guy told me what really scared him was Muslim terrorists passing through Canada.

Maybe Napolitano is using PC blather to cover for cracking down on, say, Pakistani-Canadians mad at us for bombing Pakistan?

3/30/09, 3:44 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It wouldn’t be fair to discriminate between Canadian hockey players and shoppers on the Northern border and Mexican drug cartel gangs armed to the teeth on the Southern border. I mean, there really isn’t much difference between hockey players with sticks and snow bird Canadians with loonies to spend and Mexican illegals with drug money.

3/30/09, 3:52 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's fine with me. Why don't we build a fence along the Canadian border while we are building one on the Mexican border? Granted the Canadian fence will keep out hundreds while the Mexican fence will keep out millions.

3/30/09, 4:14 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not that liberals realise this, but Canadians can pose a legitimate threat to the US. That is to say, "new Canadians" can. Regular Canadians are, as a previous poster correctly said, mostly shoppers and tourists, and about as much of a threat as a regular Wisconsinite or North Dakotan. But we give refugee status to damn near everybody, so it's actually fairly easy for somebody to get into Canada. Racial profiling would actually be way better at terrorist control than just looking at passports.

3/30/09, 6:35 PM

Anonymous Varangian said...

Strange all of a sudden they want to emphasize any border controls?

Considering they want to virtually ELIMINATE borders with their desired, long-term NAU/FTAA - NAFTA Superhighway goal.

Maybe this is all part of the Dialectic.

3/30/09, 8:19 PM

Comments are moderated, at whim.
You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL