Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Cinema Viewfinder

"FIRST LOOK - Movie Review: Extraordinary Measures (2010)"

5 Comments -

1 – 5 of 5
Blogger bill r. said...

I do like it when movies focus on different aspects of well-worn material, such as the interdepartmental communication in ZODIAC, so yes, the funding aspect of EXTRAORDINDARY MEASURES might have been an interesting surprise. It's too bad that it sounds like it's going to be exactly what it appears to be.

Harrison Ford...what the hell happened to you?

December 30, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Seriously, Bill. I was switching by Spike TV the other day during their umpteenth marathon of the STAR WARS series and caught a moment with the young Ford. He was so nimble and quick witted, dependable for both leading man and comic relief moments in that series and INDIANA JONES. Say what you will about CRYSTAL SKULL, but I was relieved at how he seemed to relax back into the role despite the many years gone by, smiling and cutting it up more than I've seen him in do in a decade. But that anomaly aside, he's stiffened up so much he's practically creaking.

December 30, 2009 at 9:35 AM

Blogger Craig said...

The last time I caught Harrison Ford having fun was way back in Working Girl. Not a great movie, but he was loosey-goosey in it. Yet even his dramatic performances, scowl and all, have been unimpressive since his mid-80s work with Peter Weir. I keep hoping for a comeback, but it's looking less likely.

One interesting note about Extraordinary Measures: It was edited by the legendary Anne V. Coates, for five decades editor of films as varied as Lawrence of Arabia and Out of Sight, and still going strong in her 80s.

December 31, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Dr. Stonehill's" real name is Dr William M Canfield of Oklahoma City. He is one of the leading Glycobiologists in the world. If it weren't for his tireless dedication to the research and development of a successful treatment for Pompe, the Crowley children (and others like them who suffer from this horrible disease) would not be where they are today. Too bad that the 'other hero' to this story is passed off as a fictional character and not given the credit that he so well deserves.

January 7, 2010 at 1:32 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

I don't know this for a fact, but I suspect Stonehill was fictionalized because Canfield may have objected to some aspect concerning the way he or his contribution to the treatment are depicted.

Thanks for bringing Canfield to our attention.

January 7, 2010 at 1:46 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot