Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Cinema Viewfinder

"Movie Review: In a Lonely Place (1950)"

4 Comments -

1 – 4 of 4
Blogger Jake said...

Of Nicholas Ray's films, I'd only previously seen Rebel Without a Cause in a semester of American History of the '50s and '60s I took in high school. But when I watched In a Lonely Place a few months ago I was completely stunned. It boasts certainly the finest of the Humphrey Bogart performances I've seen, and even though Ray is more noted for his color films I found his compositions mesmerizing and the relation of the behind-the-scenes goings-on to the narrative content fascinating. Because of In a Lonely Place I placed a blind pre-order of the new Criterion Blu of Bigger Than Life. I cannot wait to watch it this week.

March 19, 2010 at 11:35 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Yeah, I have a preview copy of the BIGGER THAN LIFE blu for me to watch this weekend. Its arrival in the mail prompted me to go back and watch some of Ray's other flicks which I had handy. So there will be an unofficial blog-a-thon here for the next few days.

Next up: JOHNNY GUITAR.

March 20, 2010 at 8:52 AM

Blogger Troy Olson said...

Fantastic review on a film I love.

I also loved the moment when Dix realizes that he can't stand the soon to be murdered girl and that any chance he had to seduce her is gone. Bogart plays the sleazy good-guy second-to-none.

That is a great point you make (via Peary) about our POV shifting from Dix to Laurel half-way in. I didn't even realize that while watching the first time.

It's also at that point that you actually start believing, even if it's just a bit, that perhaps he did commit the murder. Not many actors of that era would allow us to believe that to be true, but Bogart could and did. Ray's demons seem to be in full view in those rage/depression scenes, filtered brilliantly by Bogart.

And yet what I love about the film is that despite him being proven innocent, Dix isn't absolved of all his "crimes" in the end. He may not be a murderer, but his rage ruins any chance he has for happiness with Laurel. It's the perfect downbeat ending to the film and really caught me by surprise, but plays entirely fair with the characters (and as you point out, hews closely to Ray's own life and eerily to his relationship with Grahame).

Obviously, lots to dissect in this film. Again, great job here -- a very enjoyable read.

March 22, 2010 at 11:16 AM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Troy,

Yeah, great ending. Originally, it was shot with Bogey actually killing Grahame, and his cop friend arriving too late with the news that he was absolved of the other crime. What a kicker that one would have been. But Ray was perceptive enough, in my opinion, to realize the original ending was a bit too pat.

Rather than go for what was at the time the easy, downbeat ending where the noir protagonist is undone by his fatal flaw, he goes for a bitter, realistic, and complex ending in which both characters, still in love, decide they must go their separate ways. Brilliant.

March 22, 2010 at 5:17 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot