Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Cinema Viewfinder

"Basking in the Light of Café de Flore"

4 Comments -

1 – 4 of 4
Anonymous Ryan McNeil said...

Just curious - what is "the usual Canadian fare"?

February 8, 2013 at 3:39 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

No offense meant, Ryan. What I meant to say is that outside of those directed by Cronenberg, Egoyan, Maddin and a few other luminaries, most Canadian movies don't get much play in the U.S. unless they feature a cast of well-known faces. Otherwise, it's straight to video here. A shame really, because you guys sure seem to be a hothouse for talent.

February 8, 2013 at 4:13 PM

Blogger Ryan McNeil said...

No offence taken, it's just an odd comment. I mean, I'm Canadian and even *I* couldn't quantify "the usual Canadian fare".

What does and doesn't get play depends less on country of origin and more on the whims of an exhibitor. So much so that a lot of Canadian films have trouble getting traction in commercial Canadian multiplexes. There are a lot of markets where local films go straight-to-video here too.

February 11, 2013 at 3:17 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

I guess the only part where I'd disagree with you is in its quantification. It's more of a "negative" quantification, meaning that what I characterize as "the usual Canadian fare" is all Canadian films one might expect to see in Canadian cinemas that is still left out of American theatrical exhibition. For example, if an above average film like CAFE DE FLORE had not won any Genies, it might have also been unfairly bypassed by exhibitors here. My argument is that it's Euro feel is an asset in getting it seen here, where "art house" is practically synonymous with European (Latin American films don't fare well here, either).

February 11, 2013 at 3:42 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot