Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Cinema Viewfinder

"Nicholas Ray Blogathon: They Live By Night (1949)"

7 Comments -

1 – 7 of 7
Anonymous John Greco said...

Tony,

THEY LIVE BY NIGHT is one of the great film debuts. Visually stunning from the opening moments. Granger and O'Donnell are subtle yet express a sense of predestined doom, born losers.

September 5, 2011 at 8:29 AM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Yes, John. And O'Donnell's natural chemistry with Granger really brought out the best in the actor. Too bad, things went down as they did with Samuel Goldwyn and O'Donnell after she married William Wyler's brother. Granger and O'Donnell once seemed destined to become one of the great screen couples.

September 5, 2011 at 9:41 AM

Blogger Joel Bocko said...

Excellent take on Ray's debut - I saw and enjoyed it years ago, but its details seem to have slipped completely from memory; I didn't even recall that almost avant-garde opening until reading your and Jim's pieces.

I think someone could write an interesting piece on young-couple-on-the-run films (and probably already has), seeing how their narratives and styles vary based on time period and filmmaker.

September 5, 2011 at 1:02 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't think i've seen this one(or if i did i don't remember it), but i will try to check it out at some point.

Your review made me think a little of Blue valentine...the doomed relationship part to be exact

September 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

dirtywithclass,

I still haven't seen BLUE VALENTINE, but I'm sure it owes something to Ray's film, if only because it was one of the earliest examples of a mad, doomed love in cinema.

September 5, 2011 at 2:45 PM

Blogger Jake Cole said...

I wanted to revisit THEY LIVE BY NIGHT and IN A LONELY PLACE before this but was trying so hard just to visit all the gaps that I never made it. I remember a work of raw energy but also magnificent construction. Ray didn't start to really refine his visuals until BORN TO BE BAD, but the sheer passion of this movie remains in my mind even after specific details aren't as clear (like Joel, I don't remember the opening and now really want to see it again). It is indeed one of the greatest of debuts, but unlike, say, Citizen Kane, it still has a messiness to it that actually works to the film's advantage. Its inexperience makes it all the more direct and unorthodox. And it's a testament to Ray's insane level of quality that it comes in near the bottom of my top 10 Ray films.

September 5, 2011 at 3:07 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Jake, I hope you'll come back and leave a comment after you've seen it again. I found none of the messiness you speak of. I was surprised at how tight, both formally and storywise, it was. As advanced as CITIZEN KANE in many ways, including its unusual subjective shots, aerial shots, use of sound to enhance the story, use of diegetic music, method-style acting, etc. Thanks for commenting.

September 5, 2011 at 3:17 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot