Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Cinema Viewfinder

"Movie Review: La nana (The Maid)"

5 Comments -

1 – 5 of 5
Anonymous Sam Juliano said...

Yes, Tony, I saw this film a number of weeks ago during it's Manhattan opening and was mightily impressed. It comes close to a berth in the top ten in fact. Saavedra's minimalist performance is dead-on for this kind of reading, which as you rightly note centers around family loyalty. That sequence where teh aggressive helper was locked out and was ready to maul Saavedra was quite the hoot. But as you provocatively relate there's quite a bit to relish in this exquisite work.

December 19, 2009 at 9:58 AM

Blogger Jason Bellamy said...

I'll second Sam in terms of praise for Saavedra's minimalist performance. Alas, the film left me cold, in part because the majority of the film is minimalist to a fault. The first two thirds of the film are basically the same thing over and over: Raquel feels threatened and acts out, feels threatened and acts out, etc, etc. By the time she evolves beyond this point, I had about shut down. Still, the final third of the film made me not regret experiencing the film, though I'd find it hard to recommend. The final shot of the film is rewarding, to be sure. I just wish The Maid didn't spend so much time in one place.

Good review.

December 19, 2009 at 8:25 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

I think the repetition you mention, Jason, a)underscores the dreary life Raquel leads since her repeated torturing of each successive assistant serves as a source of diversion for her, b) it demonstrates a pattern of behavior, i.e. it isn't that she simply dislikes one assistant, and c) creates a sense of suspense when she finally meets Lucy, an assistant that the audience is easily able to identify with.

So I didn't find it minimalist in this regard. But I can certainly understand where you are coming from with your criticism.

December 19, 2009 at 9:32 PM

Blogger Jason Bellamy said...

I totally agree, Tony. This is one of those cases where I recognize that the payoff of the conclusion is largely tied to the design of what came before. So the repetition does "work," and it's certainly justified. But it is a little tedious, too. I since think the motivation of the film is what happens in the final third, this movie feels like a lot of set-up.

December 20, 2009 at 2:16 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Yeah Jason, I agree that the film is structurally unusual in its approach to the setup. I guess where we disagree is I consider it to be one of the film's virtues.

Structurally (and only structurally) it reminds me of McCABE AND MRS. MILLER in that the setup builds to almost a critical mass before the falling action actually begins very late into the film.

December 21, 2009 at 10:44 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot