Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Cinema Viewfinder

"Nominations for the 86th Academy Awards (and Brief Analysis)"

7 Comments -

1 – 7 of 7
Blogger Erich Kuersten said...

Hahah - yeah a rawther lackluster but predictable set, I was actually surprised they didn't nominate 'The Book Thief' since it's got all the ingredients Oscar loves. As for Llewyn, my guess is they either didn't see it (did they not get screeners?) and/or they don't vote for films where the lead is a jerk, because they're worried their nephews will think its okay to start being surly... or maybe they're still squirming under the yoke of the now long gone production code's moral edicts?

January 16, 2014 at 4:12 PM

Blogger tom hyland said...

Tony:

Very entertaining post. I guessed you liked "Inside Llewyn Davis," huh? "-) Seriously, the Academy has shown a lot of love toward the Coens, so the overall lack of nominations was a bit of a surprise.

How about Thelma Schoonmaker not getting a Best Editing nomination for "Wolf of Wall Street"? To me, this was a bit of a shock, especially as she's won three Oscars in this category and she received so much praise for her work with this film, trimming it down from four hours to three.

I'm a bit surprised at the lack of nominations for "Saving Mr. Banks." Did the Academy think that by honoring this film, it would have been too much of a inside pat on the back for Disney? Whatever you thought of the film - I loved it and I know you admired it as well - it is a marvelous technical work, so this could have easily been nominated for Best Editing - it certainly deserved that over "Dallas Buyers Club" in this category.

One question - why do you believe that Bruce Dern should have been a Supporting Actor nominee? This is a leading performance, it is not? I do agree with you that Robert Redford should have been nominated for Best Actor.

January 18, 2014 at 1:51 PM

Blogger Patrick Wahl said...

I saw Gravity, I liked Gravity, I just feel that it was overrated, so I see it not winning a whole lot (ditto for Her), maybe Cinematography. I think your political orientation is coloring your view of Captain Philips. Read your review, saw it a few weeks later, completely disagreed with your takes. Would have liked to see Hanks nominated, but probably can't bump any of the actual nominees either. We do agree on Inside Llewyn Davies. An odd movie but for some reason also my favorite of the year.

January 18, 2014 at 3:46 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Erich, I'm actually surprised at how unconventional the Academy went this year. They could have gone and made it strictly an AMERICAN HUSTLE or 12 YEARS sweep this year, going with a popular/art schism, shut everyone else out, and most of us would have done the typical bitch-and-moan, "I'm not that surprised" schtick we usually do, end of story.

The very fact that THE WOLF OF WALL STREET had such a respectable showing, despite its flagrant irreverence in an Oscar sense, is one reason I don't necessarily agree with your take on it. After all, its lead is a major league, surly jerk.

January 18, 2014 at 4:18 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Tom, here's why I believe Schoonmaker didn't get the nod this year. TWOWS was rushed out to theaters, through no fault of hers. If there's one problem I had with that glorious movie, it's that it still feels too fat/the pacing is off. Another 2 months, and I think it could have baked up perfectly. As it is, I'm kind of glad we got the shaggy mess we did.

SAVING MR. BANKS is just contaminated now by all of the backlash "Uncle Walt" got from so many now in positions of power in Hollywood. I mean, you know some of that fear of Disney (the man and the organization) has diminished when Streep can rip into him the way she did without fear of reprisal (she's cast as the Witch in Disney's upcoming adaptation of Sondheim's INTO THE WOODS).

As for Dern, though he plays a substantial part in NEBRASKA I still believe it is a supporting part. I always view the protagonist as the person who undergoes a change because of the story. While he certainly experienced a journey of sorts, it is Will Forte that is changed by the experience. Dern is essentially the same cranky but blissed out soul he was at the end of the picture as he was at the start. His role was supporting that of Forte. Screen time is not the measuring stick for me is what I'm saying.

January 18, 2014 at 4:29 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Patrick, I can't entirely dismiss your theory as to why CAPTAIN PHILLIPS fell flat for me. After all, I was going to defend myself with how inaccurate the story was in the movie, favoring Phillips despite the fact that many of his crew blame him for recklessly travelling through the dangerous area in the first place.

But then, the considerable inaccuracies of SAVING MR. BANKS didn't bother me one whit. So touché.

January 18, 2014 at 4:36 PM

Blogger Patrick Wahl said...

I saw a few contradictory comments from crew members on the accuracy of Captain Philips, so that did cause me to hold back from it just a bit.

January 19, 2014 at 4:01 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot