Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Cinema Viewfinder

"Underrated: John Hawkes in Winter's Bone"

9 Comments -

1 – 9 of 9
Blogger SFF said...

What a pleasure to find someone appreciate the work of John Hawkes. I couldn't agree with you more. He is sorely underappreciated in the world of cinema. He was a standout for me in the Deadwood series. He was a joy to watch.

It's funny you write about him as I just finished viewing The Perfect Storm and Hawkes was a real highlight in a film where characters really weren't given a great deal of time to develop. The overrated George Clooney, though I'm told he's come a long way, is one of the real acting lowlights in the piece.

Hawkes is a treasure that I hope gets his due someday. In the meantime, thank you for all of the recommendations concerning this fine actor. I look forward to seeing his work that I missed. I have my Millennium box set ready to go. Best, SFF

July 28, 2010 at 8:48 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Yeah, he's great with what little he gets (a reason I skipped over mentioning that) in THE PERFECT STORM.

Thanks for stopping by SFF.

July 29, 2010 at 11:07 AM

Blogger Adam Zanzie said...

I confess that I didn't recognize Hawkes in this film--the only other movie I had seen him in was Miranda July's Me and You and Everyone We Know, and in that movie he both looked younger and seemed to have a more timid voice. So when he appears in this film with that raspy voice and the gray hair, gray mustache, etc., I kept trying to figure out who he was.

It's a great film, by the way, and one of the year's biggest surprises. I'm only ashamed that, as a Missourian, I didn't even know about its production here. I also was kind of astonished by the movie's portrayal of Missouri and am already hearing comments from people who say the film has made them never want to visit this state. Personally, I had no idea there were areas of Missouri like this. Maybe that's because it's filmed in the small towns and counties down near Springfield.

July 29, 2010 at 10:48 PM

Blogger Adam Zanzie said...

Forgot to mention that I didn't recognize Sheryl Lee, either. And that's fucking Laura Palmer.

July 29, 2010 at 10:48 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Re: Missouri, Adam... any dope who says that is speaking out of pure ignorance. Haven't been there myself, but every state has its unusual territories and its more recognizable ones.

Nice to see Sheryl Lee, huh? And I'm really glad she hasn't gone down the botox route, which unfortunately may be affecting her ability to get more roles. I hope not. She is still quite sexy.

July 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM

Blogger Jason Bellamy said...

I completely agree with your praise for Hawkes. Best supporting performance of the year (at least off the top of my head). The film is so good (especially in this weak year) that it's easy to overlook his role. He makes what looks to be a kind of stick-figure villain into a flawed human. Compelling stuff.

July 31, 2010 at 6:34 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Wow, Jason. I didn't mean to go that far in my praise for Hawkes. But given this year's films, you might be right, with arguably only SHUTTER ISLAND'S cast giving him any competition in this respect.

July 31, 2010 at 7:59 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I didnt recognise Hawkes at first, and then realised there were 2 deadwood actors in the film, but hawkes blew me away with his portrayal of teardrop, this is oscar worthy.

January 11, 2011 at 9:46 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It was a wonderful supporting year with Renner,Ruffalo,Bale and Hawkes all playing very flawed,very tragic and very human characters and Rush being Rush...as to 2011 being a wek year,hope that person puts that into perspective...2012.Extremely loud up for picture n supporting actor?war horse up for picture but not director,screenplay or actor? Good God...

February 6, 2012 at 10:01 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot