Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Cinema Viewfinder

"Movie Review: Man of Steel (2013)"

4 Comments -

1 – 4 of 4
Anonymous Patrick said...

I must be about the only person who didn't care that much for the original. I thought Reeves overplayed the geekiness of Clark Kent, and Hackman and Beaty were a little campy. The one successful part was the opening 30 minutes or so with Glenn Ford, after that I thought it was just so so.

June 15, 2013 at 12:45 AM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Patrick, I don't entirely disagree with you on the tone concerning Luthor and his associates. But that was the jocular kind of camp that characterized that kind of movie in 1978 (see the Bond films' handling of Jaws).

As for Kent, it's unfair to pin that entirely on Reeve. At the time, Kent was portrayed as a bumbler on the page as well. The movies probably reinforced the image somewhat, but cinema usually just exaggerates the subject it's depicting to make it suitably larger than life.

June 15, 2013 at 6:31 AM

Blogger Aden Jordan said...

I liked your thoughtful and personal review of 'Man of Steel' and how you related the original films to your own journey through film.

I think that the first 2/3 of the film are very strong. I'm so glad that you, Glenn Kenny, and some other critics I respect and follow recognized Costner's excellent performance. I think his work in the movie might be its strongest element.

The last 1/3 of the movie was very weak in my opinion. I don't like how so many comic book movies now conclude with the bad guy decimating a major U.S. city. In addition to the endless CGI, those kind of conclusions never have the good guy outsmarting the bad guy- just being better at violence than him, which is rather lazy and generic.

June 16, 2013 at 3:35 PM

Blogger Tony Dayoub said...

Aden, I've thought long and hard about the battle royale at the end of MAN OF STEEL. After seeing the movie a second time, I've come to the conclusion that it's probably setting up the motivation for Lex Luthor. After Goyer, Nolan and Snyder did such a great job of making Zod multi-dimensional, I have to believe they want to carry that through to Luthor, whose existence is hinted at during the protracted fight between Zod and Supes. Can't you imagine Luthor as some Trump-like magnate whose enmity for Superman stems from his view of the hero not as a savior but as a threat and a magnet for future Metropolis-demolishing nemeses like Zod and his soldiers? The final battle would serve as the inciting situation that prompts Luthor to target Superman for eventual elimination.

June 16, 2013 at 7:54 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot