Google-sovellukset
Päävalikko

Post a Comment On: Cinema Viewfinder

"Blu-ray Review: The Godfather Part III - Operatic Film Deserving of Reappraisal"

2 Comments -

1 – 2 of 2
Blogger Joel Bocko said...

Excellent overview. My opinion of III used to be higher - I saw it as deeply flawed yet still at the same level as I & II. Now I would say I think its flaws are a little more damning - and I'm not entirely convinced that the old Michael could become the one we see here, though we accept it since Pacino is such a good actor. Still, it contains some power, does not disgrace the series, and its conclusion is one of the great knockout punches in cinema...more than worthy of its illustrious predecessors. You can almost see Vito's stoic, spectral face hovering over the Sicilian opera house as the seeds he sowed are reaped and harvested to the tune of Michael's silent scream (the decision to cut out the sound, which I believe was Walter Murch's, is what turns this moment - already powerful - into one of the transcendent portraits of grief and suffering in film history).

I think one of the movie's redeeming grace - aside from the finale - is that when it's underwhelming, that trait somehow seems fitting, the flaws a part of the autumnal mood. The gangsters seem flashier and less substantial than in previous outings (Zasa vs. Barzini? C'mon...), but that works because the grandeur of the Mafia has slipped away over time. Michael inspires less awe, but he's in decline and, besides, his weakness comes off as appropriately Lear-like. Sofia is truly poor in this part, but somehow her weakness as an actress makes the character - and the character's fate - all the more poignant; besides, there must have been a personal element in Coppola's staging of his daughter's death scene, which may partially explain the power of that moment (if I'm not mistaken, Coppola had only recently lost his own son).

I remember one critic saying the film should have focused on America, instead of diverting its attention to Sicily, but I disagree. While America and the immigrant experience are vitally important backdrops to The Godfather, ultimately it is a story of family and a return to the family's roots was wise. In the first half, we see how decadent and decayed and dingy the organized crime scene has become in America, and if that had been all III had to offer than, pardon the cliche, it's an offer we could have gladly refused.

"Most of the screenplays took a predictable path, killing Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) off early in the script, and passing the baton to a new generation, personified in his son, Anthony."

What a terrible, worthless movie this would have been! Thank God Coppola - while making many other more minor missteps - did not make this fundamental one. The Godfather is Michael's story; to kill him off and focus on his son, a nonentity till now would have cheapened the whole saga in a way III couldn't even have dreamed of!

November 24, 2008 at 5:33 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't see why everyone is so down on Sofia Coppola as Mary Corleone. I thought she was great and I fell in love with her character throughout the movie and her death at the end brought me to tears.

December 19, 2008 at 9:32 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot