Coronavirus latest: China tries to stop second wave as hard-hit Spain eases restrictions More than half of the planet’s population is staying home as part of efforts to stem the spread of the virus, which was first detected in China late last year and has now killed at least 112,500 people, overwhelming healthcare systems and crippling the world economy. ...... China reported the highest number of new coronavirus cases in nearly six weeks on Monday, as it tried to prevent a second wave of Covid-19 infections. ....... there are fears that a rise in imported cases could spark a second wave of Covid-19 - especially among Chinese citizens returning from abroad ....... Authorities counted 108 new coronavirus infections over the past day, including 98 cases among travellers returning from abroad ....... There are 70 coronavirus vaccines in development globally, with three candidates already being tested in human trials ........ North Korea claims the coronavirus has not made inroads into the country, with travel to and from China and Russia having been shut down since earlier this year. It has tested at least 700 people and has put more than 500 in quarantine, but has no confirmed cases of the new coronavirus, according to the World Health Organisation.
Stop covid or save the economy? We can do both shutting down the country is also the quickest way to get it started back up again ....... US GDP will drop as much as 30% to 50% by summer. ........ “an optimistic projection” for the cost of closing nonessential businesses until July was almost $10,000 per American household. ........ letting the virus spread unchecked could kill as many as 2.2 million Americans ....... his essential argument remained: that in the coronavirus pandemic, there is an agonizing trade-off between saving the economy and saving lives. ....... a false dichotomy . The best way to limit the economic damage will be to save as many lives as possible. ...... the situation is unprecedented in living memory. ........ “It isn’t like anything we’ve seen in a hundred years.” In any past recession or depression, the economic solution has always been to stimulate demand for labor—to get workers back on the job. But in this case, we’re purposely shutting down economic activity and telling people to stay at home. “It’s not just the depth of the recession,” Autor says. “It’s qualitatively different.” ......... those least able to withstand the downturn will be hit hardest—low-wage service workers in restaurants and hotels, and the growing number of people in the gig economy ......... Each adult earning less than $75,000 will be given $1,200, and for the first time, gig workers and self-employed people will qualify for unemployment benefits. Hundreds of billions of dollars will also go to helping businesses stay afloat. ........ any region with a large service economy is vulnerable ...... many of these places never recovered from the 2008 financial crisis. ......... The people losing these low-wage service jobs were already experiencing skyrocketing mortality rates from what economists have begun calling “deaths of despair,” caused by alcoholism, drug abuse, and suicide. The coming crash could make things much worse. ....... shutting down businesses is the only real choice, given that an unchecked pandemic would itself be hugely destructive to economic activity. If tens of millions of people become sick and millions die, the economy suffers, and not just because the workforce is being depleted. Widespread fear is bad for business: consumers won’t flock back to restaurants, book air travel, or spend on activities that might put them at risk of getting sick. ........ In a recent survey of leading economists by Chicago’s Booth School, 88% believed that “a comprehensive policy response” will need to involve tolerating “a very large contraction in economic activity” to get the outbreak under control. Some 80% thought that “abandoning severe lockdowns” too early will lead to even greater economic damage. ......... even moderate social distancing will save 1.7 million lives between March 1 and October 1 ...... Avoiding those deaths translates into a benefit of around $8 trillion to the economy, or about one-third of the US GDP, ....... “Our choice is whether we intervene—and the economy will be really bad now and will be better in the future—versus doing nothing and the pandemic goes out of control and really destroys the economy.” ........ the 1918 pandemic reduced national manufacturing output in the US by 18%; but cities that implemented restrictions earlier and for longer had much better economic outcomes in the year after the outbreak. .......... Cleveland and Philadelphia. Cleveland acted aggressively, closing schools and banning gatherings early in the outbreak and keeping the restrictions in place for far longer. Philadelphia was slower to react and maintained restrictions for about half as long. Not only did far fewer people die in Cleveland (600 per 100,000, compared with 900 per 100,000 in Philadelphia), but its economy fared better and was much stronger in the year after the outbreak. By 1919 job growth was 5% there, while in Philadelphia it was around 2%. ......... “A pandemic is so destructive,” he says. “Ultimately any policy to mitigate it is going to be good for the economy.” ...... The cure, then, isn’t worse than the disease. ........ there’s a way to get America quickly back in business while preserving public safety. ..... repeatedly testing everyone without symptoms to identify who is infected. (People with symptoms should just be assumed to have covid-19 and treated accordingly.) All those who test positive should isolate themselves; those who test negative can return to work, traveling, and socializing, but they should be tested every two weeks or so. .......... some might resist it or resist isolating themselves if positive ...... Each of Roche’s best machines can handle 4,200 tests a day; build five thousand of those machines, and you can test 20 million people a day. ........ “We just need to bend some metal and make some machines.” If you can identify and isolate those infected with the virus, you can let the rest of the population go back to business. .......... 93% of the economists agreed that “a massive increase in testing” is required for “an economic restart.” ....... ramping up testing and then isolating those infected rather shutting in the entire population. ....... widespread testing of various sorts to know who is vulnerable and who isn’t before we risk going back to business. ......... Many hospitals and doctors complain they can’t get needed tests; and Roche’s CEO said at the end of March that it will be “weeks, if not months” before there is widespread coronavirus testing in the US. ....... He calls the $2 trillion legislation passed by Congress “palliative care” for the economy. If you took $100 billion and put it into testing, he says, we would “be far better off.” .......... The idea that one day you will be able to restart the economy without massive testing to see if the outbreak is under control is just “magical thinking.” ........ without testing .. we will in fact be left with the Trumpian choice: between salvaging the economy and risking countless deaths.
No comments yet.
Close this window