I dunno, I'd buy it. 1994 was a pretty good year for me. I was thinner, both my cats were alive and healthy, and I could start over with that credit card.
That's a mighty pretty sink they've got there too.
I'm baffled though; it seems like that sink is fairly new, modern lines in the handles... So if they took photos of the new sink, why not just step outside and snap a few more?
On that second picture, did anyone notice the guy on the balcony, apparently yelling photography directions? "Okay, Ed, you get back enough to show off the car. Loraine, I don't care if you don't want to show that much leg! We've got a contract: full frontal and dorsal, and an option on ventral!"
September 18, 2008 at 2:14 PM
Anonymous said...
she is in the picture because...?????? no, she doesn't count as the selling point, either.
I lived in St. Louee for 6 months. Many of them really are behind the times by about 20 years. It wouldn't surprise me if the pictures were current.
September 22, 2008 at 9:57 AM
[Image]
Oh, my. The hair! The glasses! The minidress! The including of this photo at all! Anonymous, who found this listing, points out that "if you can't tell how old the photos are by her clothes, MO hasn't had the maroon license plate since 1996."
"Take my breath away-ee-ee-ayyy-eee-eee-ayyy-eee-ee-ayyyy"
17 Comments -
The shoulderpads ROCK! I personally like the second photo where she is showing some leg while posing.
So if the photos are that old, I wonder what the house looks like now! All that hairspray is bound to leave some serious residue on the sinks!!
September 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM
"Loraine! Will you pahleeez get out of the picture, we're trying to sell a house here!?
September 17, 2008 at 3:35 PM
I dunno, I'd buy it. 1994 was a pretty good year for me. I was thinner, both my cats were alive and healthy, and I could start over with that credit card.
It's lovely! I'll take it!
September 17, 2008 at 3:56 PM
There was time to take interior photos, but not exterior? Or are the interior that old also? That's scary...
September 17, 2008 at 4:06 PM
I dunno, it's a neat leather coat, but $165K? Hmm.. what? Oh!! The HOUSE! Sure... throw in the car?
September 17, 2008 at 4:14 PM
okay - you rent Top Gun, I'll pick up Pretty in Pink and The Breakfast Club... we'll make a weekend of it :)
September 17, 2008 at 4:18 PM
Ohhhh - show us a bit of leg why don't ya! That'll sell the dump fer sure!
September 17, 2008 at 5:00 PM
At least they woke her up before they went-went.
September 18, 2008 at 4:12 AM
$164,500 for the house. For $500 more, she'll let you lick her stiletto heels.
Underneath that leather coat she's got padded shoulders. Double-padded up to her ear lobes.
September 18, 2008 at 7:01 AM
Who takes a photo of just the sink?
September 18, 2008 at 8:29 AM
I am just wondering why there is a picture of only the sink. Not a bathroom shot, just the sink.
September 18, 2008 at 8:35 AM
I find the tree-like horns growing outa that hair... wicked !
September 18, 2008 at 10:07 AM
That's a mighty pretty sink they've got there too.
I'm baffled though; it seems like that sink is fairly new, modern lines in the handles... So if they took photos of the new sink, why not just step outside and snap a few more?
September 18, 2008 at 11:32 AM
165K in 1980 or now?
September 18, 2008 at 12:02 PM
On that second picture, did anyone notice the guy on the balcony, apparently yelling photography directions? "Okay, Ed, you get back enough to show off the car. Loraine, I don't care if you don't want to show that much leg! We've got a contract: full frontal and dorsal, and an option on ventral!"
September 18, 2008 at 2:14 PM
she is in the picture because...?????? no, she doesn't count as the selling point, either.
September 18, 2008 at 11:46 PM
I lived in St. Louee for 6 months. Many of them really are behind the times by about 20 years. It wouldn't surprise me if the pictures were current.
September 22, 2008 at 9:57 AM