1 – 4 of 4
Blogger mike shupp said...

The odd thing is, I think, is that he killed himself with his titles. "The Turban." "TheJade Necklace." "An Emerald Eyed Beauty."

It's hard to care. If they'd been "Lady Bettina Wapham", "Miss Eileen Ferrill," "Mrs. Edna Gathers on her 30th Birthday" and so on, we'd look at this paintings much more earnestly, likely with much more approval.

November 8, 2011 at 9:31 PM

Blogger Donald Pittenger said...

Mike -- That's a good point you made. Next: Get more variety in the source of the costumes and in the stone used in the backdrops?

November 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, yes, but then he'd have been a different guy. I suppose the question is whether he was cold bloodedly aiming for a particular market segment or whether the orientalism was actually something that personally appealed to him.

It's perhaps relevent that other -- and greater -- English artists of this time period were influenced by Japanese and Chinese art, without harm to their reputations, so Wontner was working in a vacuum. But they chose to swim with strong srokes in an alien sea, painting landscapes and urban scenes with oriental brush techniques and outlines and perhaps subjects. "Lady of Baghdad" has some interest, but Wontner's figures and bland settings are ... lacking in daring. Jugding from you show here, he waded.

I concur with your judgement.

November 9, 2011 at 11:21 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry about this, but Google is choking on my comments right now. It wants me to start a blog, and isn't interested in doing anything else, no matter how I try.

-- mike shupp

November 9, 2011 at 11:24 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL
Please prove you're not a robot