1 – 2 of 2
Anonymous dearieme said...

Thanks, Don.

P.S. Did you see the recent Velazquez story?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/artsales/8853958/Velazquez-masterpiece-mistaken-for-300-painting.html

November 2, 2011 at 9:15 AM

Blogger Donald Pittenger said...

dearieme - Thank you for the link. Interesting, if true. I'm no expert on Velazquez, and the photo had the painting too small to see brushwork, etc. Occasionally these "discoveries" turn out to be dubious after further analysis. And a few are so obviously wrong I wonder how anyone could believe the "revelation" in the first place.

The portrait in the photo looks to be skillfully done, but a bit "tighter" than some of Velazquez's other work -- a papal portrait was less freely painted, however.

So We Shall See.

November 3, 2011 at 8:01 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL
Please prove you're not a robot