Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Sipsey Street Irregulars

"David Codrea: Oath Keepers Can Take Lead on Protecting Public from Mandatory ‘Smart Guns’"

6 Comments -

1 – 6 of 6
Blogger Dakota said...

Well I have to wonder what is in it for David. It will be interesting to see how well David does with the very poorly run and lead Oath Keepers "gang". Oath Keepers couldn't lead a "kiddie parade".....good luck David....keep your eyes open.

July 10, 2015 at 11:15 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those Knuckleheads that think you have to take an oath to keep an oath?? I wouldn't let them lead anything especially after their fiasco at the Bundy Ranch.

July 10, 2015 at 12:49 PM

Blogger Jack said...

FOP will make sure no police officers ever have to worry about carrying a "smart gun" no oathkeeper input is required.

July 10, 2015 at 3:21 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oath Keepers don't think you have to take an additional oath to keep an oath. They just want you to keep the one you swore in service. They do, on occasion, hold oath renewal ceremonies, but that is something the Founding Generation did too. Catch a clue and don't be such a hater.

July 11, 2015 at 2:20 AM

Anonymous oughtsix said...

Ralph Fascitelli is missing an 's' in his last name....

July 11, 2015 at 9:22 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am all for GOVERNMENT enforcers having "smart guns". Anything to lessen their ability to enFORCE Government dictates on the people.

Heck, program them to only be fired when fired upon.




July 11, 2015 at 11:22 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot