تطبيقات Google
القائمة الرئيسية

Post a Comment On: Sipsey Street Irregulars

"Praxis: A Plan of Instruction Template from The Trainer, Part One"

4 Comments -

1 – 4 of 4
Anonymous Mr. E said...

Most excellent! THIS is precisely what is needed. More, more, more!

Please keep posting more of the thoughts of "the Trainer"

There is great need of this knowledge, of the hard lessons learned, and especially in the context of 4th Gen. warfare as we may have to fight.

I sincerely hope it does not come to that, but if it does, let us wage and win it to the utmost of our abilities.

February 4, 2009 at 12:24 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent post. Just like in the massive online game Dark Orbit. There are two particular class of ships in that game, the elusive Vengeance, and the leviathan star-cruiser Goliath. One player would always expect the leviathan to always win. However, the underdog Vengeance relies on speed. It is the fastest ship in the game. And having that game for a long time, I have seen players flying the Vengeance kick the leviathan's ass all the time. One match I observed, the Vengeance guy was hammering a leviathan to pieces, while the leviathan couldn't even catch up.

Speed is your ally, as well as darkness and shade.

Re: j3maccabe from a previous post. LOL! I don't get pissed off by anthing except tyranny-happy fascists. INGSOC in "1984" sure pissed me the hell off.
BTW the mountainous hunting lands upstate are also excellent areas to do some long range rifle practice. Also the weight of slugs directly corresponds to how a rifle will perform at a long distance. At ranges above 600 yards, the heavier slugs always rule. While many gun newbies like the .223 or the blistering .204 Ruger because of the velocity and adrenaline, long range shooting requires utmost patience and calculation of loads. And speaking of loads, you always want to stick with a heavier slug that delivers lower velocity but higher stability at extended ranges. Billy Dixon once downed a Comanche on horseback at Adobe Walls in 1874 at app. 1500 yards. That was with a Sharps heavy hunter design. And during that time, optics were primitive. The most that Billy Dixon could have had with him was probably a Malcolm/Davidson type scope. Most Creedmore legends were achieved with iron sights only.

February 4, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

If I join a firefighting company, I am legally free to quit and go home at any time. I may forfeit financial penalties for work I haven't performed, and the whole community of my former teammates may curse my name forever for abandoning them while in danger, but I am not shot or imprisoned for "cowardice in the face of the enemy" or being "absent without leave".

On the other hand, to my knowledge, members of every nations' special operations community are indentured servants, who are not legally free to quit their jobs at any time.

Does Trainer feel that anyone who has accepted his leadership is also free to reject it and go home, at any time, even during a battle, without criminal legal penalty?

February 5, 2009 at 1:40 AM

Anonymous The Trainer said...

Anonymous says:"Does Trainer feel that anyone who has accepted his leadership is also free to reject it and go home, at any time, even during a battle, without criminal legal penalty?"

First, to stay on point on the purpose of the POI, it is to give various groups needing structure for their training a template that transcends typical "militia" Attrition Warfare mindset copied from previous experience in a 'regular' military organization. This template should be modified to meet their needs as their group leadership sees fit. After all, it's their lives they're betting on how well they prepare themselves organizationally and skill wise. If you want to live and win, the AW methodology has to be changed to that of a MW group because Civilian Indigenous Personnel do not have the cornucopia of replacements and resupply that an AW unit has.

So, that being said, group training as a unit of volunteers isn't "civilian employment" that a man trades his time and knoweldge for financial renumeration, so your examples are not valid when balanced against the purpose of the POI.

On staying or leaving, a good rule of thumb for groups to consider when training is this: While present at training, or God forbid, in a real-world operation, should it come to that, members must be bound to follow their team, squad, and platoon leaders direction so far as their conscience will allow.

Allowing 'lone wolf' or 'nobody can tell me what to do' types into your 'merry little band' is bad news for the group and really lower the survival odds in a bad situation, because as sure as God made little green apples, that person will cause dissention and will not stick when things turn ugly.

But to extrapolate a bit on your example of leaving anytime one desires, even during a battle.

Well, Sir, leaving once a battle was enjoined "just because" elevates the level of risk faced by other team members and would demonstrate a complete disregard for the bonds of trust formed during long hours of arduous training in adverse conditions, and would really be abberant behavior on the part of the man who decided "oh, well, I'm leaving now, have fun!".

But let's just speculate that did happen - a man chooses to leave in the midst of a battle 'just because he chose to do so.' Presuming that this man's action didn't cause the death of the rest of his team, I'd hope that any survivors escaping would track him down and kill him for the coward he showed himself to be. But that's just speculation, as I say.

I hope this answers your question.

February 5, 2009 at 7:37 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot