Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Fawcett Avenue Conscripts

"We're Terminators, We Don't Do "Objectives"."

3 Comments -

1 – 3 of 3
Blogger Curt said...

Great batrep and the pics look brilliant!

I can only imagine the language being uttered on turn 6... You really need to play your own scenarios that are not based on these byzantine conditions that have been designed for tournament play. Objectives can't be held by 'non-Troop' units? Gimmee a break...

July 7, 2011 at 11:25 AM

Blogger Greg B said...

Yep - the 40k rules in all their glory. Good thing we grabbed that ammunition cannister. Definitely a Thorpian outcome.

I'm surprised we lasted at all. While the Punisher Cannons are stupendous, the rest of the lot really struggled with the Land Raider, Assault Squad, and Terminators.

Were it not for the obtuse rules in question, we would have lost for sure!

July 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM

Blogger DaveV said...

Thanks for posting the great writeup and pix. Sorry I couldn't attend, we were at my in-law's place.

RE: Scoring units:
the 40K 5th ed. mechanic was designed to force players to take and use basic troops, not just the killy stuff. I suppose it is analogous to WWII panzer forces seizing a position, which is then consolidated upon by follow-up leg infantry.

That being said, other sci-fi rules sets (such as Mantic's new "Warpath") don't make such artificial distinctions between what types of units can control objectives.

Also, some tournaments (e.g. Astronomi-con) often have very narrative scenario elements: interrupting a daemonic ritual, capturing a downed pilot, seizing a starport, trying to obtain ammo crates because you're actually low on ammunition...

July 7, 2011 at 3:18 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.