Google apps
Main menu

"Safer Streets: Will Dean Skelos and Jeff Klein's Senate Step Up?"

2 Comments -

1 – 2 of 2
Blogger LLroomtempJ said...

It passed. Whatever. I don't think that there is anything inherently unsafe about a 30mph speed limit.

If you want to slow people down, install speed control devices, speed cameras and *actually* enforce the law.

Rarer is the case that speed contributes to a pedestrian fatality in a crowded city than is the case where negligence (obliviousness, failure to yield) and aggression on the part of both driver and pedestrian drive pedestrian deaths.

A lot of what has happened in NYC over the past 10 years w/r/t traffic policy feels more like "anti-car" policy than it does "common sense" policy.

We all want fewer deaths, but it feels like the people in control want fewer cars on the road. I can understand such a sentiment, but it does not appropriately take into account disparities in access to mass transit across all 5 boroughs. It also doesn't take into account that mass transit, biking and walking aren't always practical options (eg - grocery shopping, commuting to work in certain parts of the city or outside the city etc)

June 23, 2014 at 11:07 AM

Blogger Gary said...

Speed is not the only factor but it is an important factor. And the speed limit reduction is only a part of the broader Vision Zero package - with emphasis on enforcement and physical improvements to the roads. Traffic calming measures such as daylighted intersections, planted medians, wider pedestrian refuges, etc.

Most people in NYC don't own a car. Transit access throughout the city needs to be improved - I think the MoveNY program will help to provide funds for that as well as improvements to the street grid that will benefit drivers. And a more rational tolling scheme that will benefit everybody.

Owning a car is not cheap. And there are reasonable alternatives for some things, like grocery shopping, such as home delivery or a car service. Then there's carshare like Zipcar.

Ultimately there simply is not room in the city to encourage more car use. Nor is there room in the Clean Air Act, which mandates that we reduce emissions (hence the parking maximums in the central business district).

A car can be a useful thing - I own one! But the externalities of private car use have to be adequately addressed.

We still have a city that offers free parking on most of its public streets. That doesn't sound anti-car to me.

But the main thing is that this will save lives, and it is only a part of a bigger package of policy changes.

June 23, 2014 at 1:33 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot