Was it really necessary to share this? That poor lad will hear no end to the teasing he will have to endure. Thoughtless parents to expose their child to what should be a very private moment.
Further - 3 years old? When is enough enough?
May 10, 2012 at 9:05 PM
Anonymous said...
I agree, while I'm all for breast feeding in the public, this child is far too old to be suckling his mother's teet.
May 11, 2012 at 5:12 PM
Anonymous said...
Its fine to nourish your child but this lady looks angry or bored, not sure which one. After a certain age breast milk does not fill your child and it becomes a habit for comfort. This private moment should have stayed private. Thank you a-holes at Time for this Mother's Day issue.
May 11, 2012 at 9:40 PM
Time magazine has a provocative cover photo that is getting a lot of folks talking. With Mother's Day around the corner, you can be sure we will be hearing more about this.
[Image]
posted by Richard Beene at 3:56 PM on May 10, 2012
"Time magazine's cover stirs up some controversy"
3 Comments -
Was it really necessary to share this? That poor lad will hear no end to the teasing he will have to endure. Thoughtless parents to expose their child to what should be a very private moment.
Further - 3 years old? When is enough enough?
May 10, 2012 at 9:05 PM
I agree, while I'm all for breast feeding in the public, this child is far too old to be suckling his mother's teet.
May 11, 2012 at 5:12 PM
Its fine to nourish your child but this lady looks angry or bored, not sure which one. After a certain age breast milk does not fill your child and it becomes a habit for comfort. This private moment should have stayed private. Thank you a-holes at Time for this Mother's Day issue.
May 11, 2012 at 9:40 PM