Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Bakersfield Observed

"Rep. Kevin McCarthy: honoring our veterans, making the rounds in the district"

8 Comments -

1 – 8 of 8
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why do you run this stuff from McCarthy? It's nothing more than his own PR -- me, me, me, I'm doing so much great stuff for you -- and can't I get that at his website or his blog? It's so boring.

May 23, 2009 at 11:47 AM

Blogger Richard Beene said...

He's our congressman and I don't have any philosophical problem giving him a forum. I personally am curious as to what he views as the priorities of the day. I'd equally have no problem providing a similar forum to the sheriff, the city manager or the police chief. These are folks we entrust with our tax dollars and to make good decisions. There's a time for a "Meet the Press" type grilling and a time to let them have their say.

May 23, 2009 at 12:15 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It just seems like the "old journalism," the DBI (dull but important) stuff you complained about in your Jarvis entry. I'm not looking for a grilling, just something interesting.

May 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

An interesting exchange to date. Allow me to join in with three comments. First, Bakersfield is represented in the House by not one, but two individuals, the other being Jim Costa. A quick look at a map of congressional districts shows Mr. McCarthy does not represent all of Bakersfield. Second, not only are Mr. McCarthy's updates duplicated in this blog, they also are printed in the Californian, apparently verbatim. Because Mr. McCarthy is reaching so many people by having his updates printed at no charge in the paper, would he be willing to do his part to reduce the federal deficit by giving up his franking privileges (free mail to constituents)? Third, you mention you would have no problem printing similar updates from others, such as the City Manager. As you know, Mr. Tandy already provides an update to the City Council each Friday that is available to your reporter. I do not see those weekly updates printed in your blog or in the Californian. However, I am not suggesting you do so because, boy, would you have a lot of stuff to include!

May 25, 2009 at 11:21 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's the response, Mr. Beene? Why not run Jim Costa's same schmoozing baloney that McCarthy gets to run in your paper or at least in your blog, if paper is too expensive? It seems like the right thing to do. Even the idea that Tandy's stuff might be interesting enough for your blog is intriguing. (Did you know that your reporter gets those updates weekly?)

May 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM

Blogger Richard Beene said...

Anon:
First, you need to differentiate between my blog and my position at the paper. This is a personal blog that doesn't earn me a dime. I write about what interests me or about things, like the arts or high achieving kids, that I find important for our community. I'm an unapologetic cheerleader at times, I often feature people I know or schmooze with, and I'm under no obligation to be "fair" to anyone. And if the mood strikes me, I kind of enjoy being snarky from time to time. I asked Kevin McCarthy to write because I think he is someone to watch. He's interesting and I personally like his moderate politics. When I mentioned other voices, like Tandy or even Jim Costa, I did so in the philosophical sense that - in media - I do believe in openness. But this is a blog, not a mass media product, and my choice is to limit who I give a forum to. From your remarks and the fact that you prefer to write anonymously, I assume you are either a political gadfly or you are working in media - possibly at TBC - or did so at one time. What I detect from your remarks is the old longing to "control" the conversation. Why else are you baiting me with the fact that I allow a politician a forum? Here's some free advice: get over it. The days of journalists being "gatekeepers" to content are over. The news sites that succeed will be "open source" in the sense that they will welcome outside input, from "citizen journalists" to politicians and - yes - perhaps even a link to Alan Tandy's weekly report. I have no issue with that and in fact you I bet you will see much more of that both in print and on our website in the near future. So there it is. Thank for the input.

May 26, 2009 at 9:42 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for taking the time to respond. Your comments are well-taken and I appreciate the fact that you acknowledge that you wish to promote your friends on the blog, which is your perogative; I would find it more refreshing if you openly identified them as such. It's nice that you volunteer your time without any financial benefit in providing this blog to the public. I appreciate that, too. You say that news sites/organizations that will succeed will apparently follow this same free-for-all blog-like format without any substantiation proving that this format can be successful. We can respectfully agree to disagree; I look forward to your next pearls of wisdom.

May 26, 2009 at 7:51 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice job, Thanks

August 8, 2012 at 4:38 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.