Just ran into this today: Designers and Abstract Classes.
This sucks. I had a nice abstract class implementing an interface to force child forms to implement the interface - now I can't to that in any elegant fashion. Do I implement the interface on the base class and provide empty virtual method implementations, thereby ensuring that the interface is followed - but not that a true implementation is completed - or do I just hope that the child controls will implement the interface?
posted by Oskar Austegard at 5:10 PM on Aug 4, 2004
"Designers and Abstract Classes"
No comments yet. -