Googles appar
Huvudmeny

Post a Comment On: cbloom rants

"09-22-12 - Oodle Beta and Roadmap"

3 Comments -

1 – 3 of 3
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In your comparison of LZNib against the other compressors, you didn't include OodleLZs. But I take it LZNib's speed vs. size isn't interesting enough to be worth pursuing for Oodle?

(I though the fact that it beat zlib was pretty amazing, even if I am sad that you stole my thunder.)

September 23, 2012 at 4:26 PM

Blogger cbloom said...

"In your comparison of LZNib against the other compressors, you didn't include OodleLZs."

Yeah, cuz they would just kill it, they're at a different place on the space/speed tradeoff; I was trying to only compare to other bytewise compressors, but tossed in Zip as well as a well-known baseline.

"But I take it LZNib's speed vs. size isn't interesting enough to be worth pursuing for Oodle?"

Yeah it definitely is interesting; it's on the list as "LZB" ; I'm not sure yet exactly what OodleLZB will be, I have a few different ideas to explore aside from LZNib before I set that in stone.

I see LZB as being ideal on platforms with very little spare CPU that can't even afford to run an LZH.

I wish I had a team of graduate students to go off and implement all my ideas; I have way more than I have time to get to. It was only the rumbling of your imminent thunder that got me motivated to go try LZNib, which is an idea I've been sitting on for a long time. Nothing like the whiff of competition to get me motivated.

September 23, 2012 at 5:33 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, somehow I misread "LZ-bytewise" as something else (I don't remember what, but I know I was looking for that).

Cool beans.

September 23, 2012 at 10:56 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.