1 – 16 of 16
Blogger Phil said...

Great looking unit...
Phil.

12 March 2013 at 16:14

Blogger Dalauppror said...

Exellent painting !!!

Best regards Michael

12 March 2013 at 17:49

Blogger BigRedBat said...

Thanks chaps. Photo is a bit blurry, but better when clicked on.

12 March 2013 at 17:51

Blogger veghist said...

Sorry to be a spoilsport, but peltastAi of the era wore usually linothorax, thureos and had javelins, no way they carried the sarissa
Besides I wanted to comment earlier, painting bright colours especially purples is not historically correct. I know Nik Secunda supports this wiew in hios Osprey books, but there is little supporting evidence. Paint like tkis was extremely rare and highly expensive in antiquity; such clothes and helmets would cost almost a lifetime of earnings for a normaql citizen. (if you are interested I have more details; I was part of the Europa Barbarorum team if it means something for you) I love your armies btw!

12 March 2013 at 18:46

Blogger Stig of the Dump said...

They look great, nice colours.

I will eventually get around to doing a pike armed army, how do you store them?

Steve

12 March 2013 at 18:51

Blogger BigRedBat said...

Hi Steve, I store them in 9L Really Useful Boxes. A box takes 192, without much wasted space. I'll show a pic in the next day or so.

12 March 2013 at 18:55

Blogger Stig of the Dump said...

i use really useful boxes too, but i use the 21 litre ones, with Figures in comfort trays. The FiC trays fit bang on.

Im Just worried about broken pikes...

Anyway, great looking troops.

steve

12 March 2013 at 19:04

Blogger BigRedBat said...

Hi veghist, I also suspect they may have worn linothorax, but I don't think they could have had thureos or they wouldn't have been called peltastoi. As well as Secunda, I have heard Duncan Head argue for them being part of the phalanx, and I've based these on the new Stephane Thion book, who has gone with the same approach.

I did weigh up whether to make minis with a smaller shield than the phalanx, and a shorter pike (which the peltastoi may have used) but in the end I decided I wanted the phalanx to look alike, and didn't want to cut off the shields.

I'm happy with red tunics and crests, per the Sidon stelae. I don't think red would be very expensive. I'd agree purple would be uncommon, as very expensive. But there is evidence for purple cloth as tunic borders for guard. My phalanx in purple came painted that colour, I wouldn't have painted them that way, myself (except I painted minis to match).

I'm glad you enjoy the blog, and am always happy to discuss uniforms and equipment!

Cheers, Simon

12 March 2013 at 19:17

Blogger BigRedBat said...

Steve, I'll take photos of the storage tomorrow. No lost pikes around here! :-)

12 March 2013 at 19:20

Blogger DeanM said...

Very flashy tunics there. Nice work. Dean

12 March 2013 at 20:20

Blogger EinarOlafson said...

Good looking unit!!

12 March 2013 at 20:42

Blogger veghist said...

Yes, red is fine, red pigment from madder, or even carmine from Kermes beetles was readily available. Purple and non-indigo blues (or woad, this is the same pigment or very close)are off limits, as the later needs a lot of lapis lazuli mined in antique Pakistan mixed with shellack to work.
As for the peltastai, the pelte originally was a crescent shaped shield used by Thracians (much like this guy http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-dJGQ74v_JdM/Td4wurOhRkI/AAAAAAAABhI/1wYo3WFco44/s1600/tentara-yunani-kuno-5.jpg ).
Later the use of peltastai became more and more important - but they always been skirmishers.
In Hellenistic times the equipment became much heavier which led to the Thureophoroi and the Thorakitai.
This is a good essay for those interested:
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/luke/ueda-sarson/Iphikrates2.html

12 March 2013 at 21:45

Blogger BigRedBat said...

Hi Veghist,

I've seen the Ueda-Sarson piece.

I disagree with his conclusion that peltasts were always skirmishers. I believe that over time the term became used to refer to any troops equipped with an unusually small, round shield. Duncan Head argued (more recently than Luke's article) that the peltasts at Cynoscephalai were close order infantry.

I suspect that the peltasts in the guard were capable of using javelins, or pike, depending on circumstances. At Raphia they were in the main line of battle between the Agema and the line phalanx; probably not a good place for skirmishing. Hence my decision to equip with pikes... although likely shorter sarissae might have been used (as Aelian mentions), in order to allow the young lightly-armed troops to move more quickly than the main phalanx. I suspect that the agema and peltasts acted as a "hinge" between the main phalanx and the cavalry.

I doubt it can ever be proved either way, though, and it comes down to a personal choice as to how they are equipped.

Re purple, the Egyptians would have better access than most to the Murex sea-snails and the places where purple fabric was manufactured.

Cheers, Simon

12 March 2013 at 22:28

Blogger Unknown said...

Interesting conversation. And very nice minis too.
Seb

12 March 2013 at 23:30

Blogger Simon MacDowall said...

Duncan Head gives a really good argument for the 'peltasts' being pikemen in some later Hellenistic armies - it convinces me.
It is always confusing when archaic terms are carried over into a new era. I used to serve in the Royal Canadian Dragoons but we were neither horse cavalry nor mounted infantry.
Certainly the 'peltasts' at Pydna could not have been skirmishers. So I think your interpretation is quite realistic.
Other Simon

17 March 2013 at 20:46

Blogger BigRedBat said...

Thanks Other Simon!

I have the other 21 agemata recruits in front of me just now, they are going to be a cracking unit.

17 March 2013 at 21:22

Thanks for commenting. I will post this as soon as I am able to review it.
You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot