1 – 5 of 5
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2 things:

1. Noble doesn't actually explicitly say Kyle is guilty here, indeed he uses "eyewitness" in scare quotes to suggest that Sturrup might be lying, but he does say the "bombing incident" was provoked (gotta love the use of the passive voice here). Either way, Noble clearly has no shame about putting pressure on a witness in a criminal trial (which I'm pretty sure is more than a little bit illegal). I'm just saying this isn't quite the smoking gun that OPP is acting like it is.

2. This should really be forwarded to the crown prosecutor in McKee's current trial. It probably isn't admissible as evidence but more info might help them build a case.

6 March 2011 at 16:58

Anonymous Anonymous said...

WTF is ATB?

6 March 2011 at 22:13

Anonymous Anonymous said...

i'm pretty sure everyone "knew" it was kyle. But how many of them actually witnessed it? tnight before the bombing, there was a house party at kyle's that went to the wee hours of the morning. About six hours after the story hit the news damn near all the kids at the party called the cops to say kyle had done it. none of their testemonies were admissable though because they didn't witness the attack or anything.

7 March 2011 at 07:52

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"But it appears that someone who did download the information went an extra step and used information that was found to log into some of Noble's online accounts"

----------------------------
You guys blew your chance of hacking emails and PM's just to post this? What a waste. Sounds to us like you were just a tad eager to write a new 'article'.

Kyle's best option at this moment would be, to cut a sweet heart deal with the RCMP/CSIS in favour of retrieving personal information about who exactly runs ARC, and pass such information onto certain people.

After all, does CSIS really care about some loser Skinhead and his Communist foes? Don't for a second put it past CSIS/RCMP.

7 March 2011 at 10:13

Blogger nos200 said...

We didn't "hack" anything. The information was posted to another website and we republished it here. With that said, we don't know if we should assume that this is all there is. Perhaps there are more gems to be released?

And we got to tell ya, we've a feeling that CSIS have bigger fish to fry than the members of ARC. None of us have ever broken the law (we can count the number of traffic tickets we've collectively amassed on one hand). And besides, perhaps CSIS knows exactly who we are already. And perhaps they are pleased with our work?

Let the paranoia begin.

8 March 2011 at 17:02

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot