1 – 6 of 6
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Their graffiti is not aesthetically pleasing at all.

20 May 2009 at 10:17

Anonymous AuntieFa said...

backwards swastika = sieg fail

20 May 2009 at 11:29

Anonymous Anonymous said...

What, in particular, about this neanderthal goonery causes you to label it "Pro Nuclear"?

Anti-Activist, would be more defendable as a counter accusation, than "Pro-Nuclear".

Do not smear responsible believers in nuclear energy, by falsely linking them with goons who hate YOU, or your movement, or its symbols.

20 May 2009 at 12:50

Anonymous Anonymous said...

We are experiencing some similar behaviour here in the Nanticoke, Ontario area where Bruce Power has a bid to build a new nuke plant. Our "No Nukes" lawn signs are disappearing from private property almost as fast as we put them up.

This local newspaper article was on the front page with a large photo showing one of our supporters holding a lawn sign. The silver lining is that the theft of our signs has given us more publicity than the posting of signs has done. The pro-nukers have been exposed and denounced as anti-free speech, undemocratic, un-Canadian cowards and bullies. Our respectful, legal anti-nuke campaign will gain from their malicious actions.

Jim Elve
Grand Erie Energy Quest

20 May 2009 at 22:20

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://loyalkng.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/sieg-fail-pic.jpg

22 May 2009 at 14:44

Anonymous Anonymous said...

we're talking about people who say you do your activism "threw a monitor". drawing the swastika backwards is hardly a stretch.

22 May 2009 at 14:46

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot