It gets a bit surreal when you find Fromm AND Meir Weinstein and the JDL on the same side of an issue. You'd think that the Fourniers' choice of legal representation kind of type casts them. But what's coming up isn't about "free speech" at all. It's just several variations of allegedly malicious personal defamation. Then there's this now too..... http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/07/03/white-supremacist-can-seek-help-online-in-attempt-to-prove-racist-claims-court/
4 July 2012 at 02:23
Anonymous said...
This link doesn't work: "violently stifle the speech of those they disagree with."
Back on June 14, we briefly mentioned that Dr. Dawg had won his appeal and that the case would now go to trial.
We don't want to argue the merit of the arguments involved, but we can't help but notice the odd assortment of characters who have lined up over the past year to support the Fourniers in this case.
When Dawg first filed his suit, Paulie chimed in with his support for the Fourniers:
[Image]
In another more recent post, Paulie called on his followers to support the Fourniers and Free Dominion after Dawg won his appeal.
Today, we learned that the Fourniers will be supported by another group:
At least one of the Free Dominion posters has some concerns about this support:
[Image]
To which "shiva" replies:
[Image]
The issue (and link) "shiva" is referring to is found here in the JDL's support of Dutch windbag, anti-Muslim politician Geert Wilders, but it is interesting that "shiva" notes the JDL commitment to free speech is not an issue IF they at least support views congruent with those found on Free Dominion.
Hey, we aren't fans of Galloway, but if you're all for Wilders speaking in Canada (a man who has fomented ethnic and religious bigotry in his own country), it seems a might hypocritical to deny Galloway the right to speak in Canada.
Getting back to Paulie, we wonder what he might think of the JDL's support for Free Dominion.
Because, you know, the JDL doesn't really like Paulie either:
[Image]
Another one of our friends sent us the following:
So let me get this straight, Meir Flintstone [we love that name!] is raising money for the Fourniers who:
a) have as their lawyer Barbara Kulaszka who not only acted as
Ernst Zundel's lawyer but also edited this charming book published by
Zundel's Samisdat Publishers as well as representing Marc Lemire, Imre Finta and Arthur Rudolph
b) consider Marc Lemire and Paul Fromm to be their friends and Lemire as one of their key witnesses c)
knowingly accepted an award from Doug Christie, who has made a career
of representing neo-nazis and war criminals and is known to have far
right views himself
So are Marc, Paul and Barbara invited to the fundraiser or would the
JDL beat them to a pulp if they showed up (decisions, decisions)?
Well, there might not be a fight, but we imagine that it would make for an awkward evening.
3 Comments
Close this window Jump to comment formIt gets a bit surreal when you find Fromm AND Meir Weinstein and the JDL on the same side of an issue. You'd think that the Fourniers' choice of legal representation kind of type casts them. But what's coming up isn't about "free speech" at all. It's just several variations of allegedly malicious personal defamation. Then there's this now too..... http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/07/03/white-supremacist-can-seek-help-online-in-attempt-to-prove-racist-claims-court/
4 July 2012 at 02:23
This link doesn't work: "violently stifle the speech of those they disagree with."
4 July 2012 at 16:56
Fixed
4 July 2012 at 18:14