1 – 8 of 8
Anonymous Anonymous said...

LOL, only Pauly would refer to McKee as being an 'Alpha'... sawed-off lil runt is pathetic. Just another braindead bonehead tool, desperately making noise to distract the world from what an epic failure he is as a human being.

21 May 2011 at 01:33

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kyle is only a "leader" of little kids.Nobody respects the little clown. He is a publicity hound.

21 May 2011 at 06:47

Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know what's hilarious in my opinion. In this note, you mentioned that WN's cover their true beliefs. Well, so do anti- racists. You people are not against racism. You are against the WN movement due to personal hatred towards the members. Quite a few of you used to be WN skinheads. All the anti- racist movement stands for is revenge.

21 May 2011 at 10:02

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Try appropriate countermeasures in order to prevent further unneccessary tragedies. Revenge is a matter of immediacy. Countering fascist ideology however, is a duty and necessity for those who value their freedom. The lessons of history have not been forgotten. Our liberty has been earned with the blood of those fallen before us. We will not allow their sacrifice to be in vain. Remember that.

23 May 2011 at 18:36

Blogger norton200 said...

I'll admit to being out of the loop because I've been busy quitting smoking. When I'm not gorging on things that are slightly less harmless that the cancer sticks I have to wonder if this is the best media can do.

What was the point? To give an "objective view" of McKee? Give him some kind of human touch? Maybe give him the benefit of the doubt? I've dealt with McKee's interviews. They're nothing short of awkward and embarrassing (in that any human can be that inarticulate, ignorant and hateful).

I'm not trying to be a dick, but the piece you quote is a chop job. It has no urgency or relevance. It brings up nothing new. There's no real reason to even mention McKee, let alone make him the focus of an article.

Dude is old news. Can we let him go the way of the washed up Hollywood type now? (As in we keep an eye out but don't report unless it's important.)


A

25 May 2011 at 01:28

Blogger norton200 said...

And by "we" I mean Josh Brown and his ilk. There have to be more interesting and deserving ex-Kitchener residents for Brown to write about than McKee. Yeesh.

25 May 2011 at 09:05

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Norton200,

This article was done months ago and only published recently for some reason. As the post states it seems "pretty outdated," but when it was done it was wholly relevant.

Further, this article is miles ahead of the truly shit article in the Calgary Journal "Beyond the Swastika." You think it's a chop job? Ha! Try reading the latter piece before you slag this one. At least it mentioned some of Kyle's crimes and interviewed anti-racist sources.

You may think that it's not interesting and is boring, and I hate to break it to you, but there are many, many people who do not know who he is to this day. That's the whole point: to expose him to people still in the dark.

And possibly you do not understand this, but such pieces as this one are useful for anti-racists in exposing these scum. Contrary to the neo-Nazi myth, anti-racist groups are not getting funding from other groups!

Kyle is old news? So next time he threatens someone or tries to kill them, then he's news? So the victims and their family members are just news items? You better talk to some victims of their violence and terror, because I can assure you they DO NOT think he's old news. Especially as he's getting out in the next month!

You may not have tried to be a dick, but you have singularly failed. Your comments are rude and ignorant. Please check yourself.

I thought this post and the piece it features was useful.

25 May 2011 at 22:29

Blogger norton200 said...

I’ll admit that the way I phrased my comment didn’t properly convey my meaning and came off arrogant and dismissive. That wasn’t my intent and I apologize for coming across that way.

I get the impression this comment is coming from the writer. As a writer myself I know that dealing with reader comments can feel like you’ve thrown yourself into a shark tank with a paper cut. But, you have to learn to take it if you want to speak in a public forum.

“Beyond the Swastika” was a shitty, shitty piece. As I recall, we (as in a couple of collective members) didn’t say anything about it because we didn’t want to draw attention to it. It was published in a student newspaper at a small college with a very small readership. I debated sending the writer an email to point out the flaws in both her approach and execution, but frankly it fell off my radar within minutes. This article likely would have been ignored as well if it wasn’t providing “vital business and community information to millions of readers across Ontario each week” as part of Metroland.

If many people (in your area) don’t know who McKee is, that’s a good thing. Why bring him up to people who don’t care? Until he shows up in your space, why give him any publicity at all? We’re dealing with him as best we can here.

Yes, I said here. I’m right here. Right in the middle of Alberta. The “victims and families” are people I know (and in some cases care a lot about). Here, we’ve all been exposed to the scum. So, I think you might want to back down a bit on me being clueless to what it means to be an “anti.”

Anyway, as I was saying this kind of article draws attention to McKee that he neither deserves nor needs. I understand that in writing this you had good intentions, but I’ve read it several times and it still doesn’t come across to me as necessary or helpful. You've given him a platform he didn't previously have with people who may or may not see him as a bad guy.

26 May 2011 at 02:45

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot