In reference to the old newspaper story (as I don't know enough about the Tamil thing to give my opinion on it): Fromm should move his ass to Arizona and stay there, join in on the tea parties where he belongs, we don't need these ignorant, racist jackasses that claim every left-wing policy is socialism and claim their bigoted bullshit as reasonable policies. I'm sure he loves the United States, where you get to vote between a right-wing government and a far-right-wing government.
18 August 2010 at 01:23
Davegeek said...
I like how in the article it comments that Mr. Fromm quit the Western Guard because it "lost its quality of tolerance". Now he pals around with neo-Nazi skinheads. I'm going to guess that extremist intolerance is no longer of concern to Mr. Fromm.
18 August 2010 at 16:44
Anonymous said...
"a right-wing government and a far-right-wing government."
You're kidding me right?
19 August 2010 at 13:04
Anonymous said...
Rachel Maddow once said, "I'm undoubtedly a liberal, which means that I'm in almost total agreement with the Eisenhower-era Republican party platform." I'm really not kidding at all, it's pretty much common knowledge that the United States has been steadily drifting further and further to the right for years.
23 August 2010 at 17:59
Davegeek said...
Yeah, I would say that something as simple as universal health care being equated with rampant socialism is pretty indicative of a pretty right-wing framing of the political dialogue. The "liberal" wing of the Dems would fit quite nicely in with Republicans from the 50s. And Barry Goldwater, who was considered a ultra-rightist in the 60s, would be viewed as suspiciously "moderate" were he to be in the GOP of today. Let's not forget it was the allegedly liberal Clinton who extended the federal death penalty in a crime omnibus, who "reformed" welfare, and who pursued a foreign policy that involved considerable military intervention abroad.
Interestingly, one of the voices of those opposing the Vietnamese boat people is the same one who is now opposing Tamil migrants. And like his opposition to the Vietnamese, Paul Fromm's reasons for opposing the Tamils haven't changed in 30 years:
[Image]
We know that none of the claims made by Fromm, Collins or the people opposing the entry of refugees into Canada actually came to fruition. The Vietnamese boat people integrated into Canadian society, their children becoming doctors, teachers, tradesmen and women, and community leaders. Yet the anti-refugee and anti-immigrant rhetoric hasn't changed at all.
We'll keep that fact in mind as the latest group of refugees are processed.
5 Comments
Close this window Jump to comment formIn reference to the old newspaper story (as I don't know enough about the Tamil thing to give my opinion on it): Fromm should move his ass to Arizona and stay there, join in on the tea parties where he belongs, we don't need these ignorant, racist jackasses that claim every left-wing policy is socialism and claim their bigoted bullshit as reasonable policies. I'm sure he loves the United States, where you get to vote between a right-wing government and a far-right-wing government.
18 August 2010 at 01:23
I like how in the article it comments that Mr. Fromm quit the Western Guard because it "lost its quality of tolerance". Now he pals around with neo-Nazi skinheads. I'm going to guess that extremist intolerance is no longer of concern to Mr. Fromm.
18 August 2010 at 16:44
"a right-wing government and a far-right-wing government."
You're kidding me right?
19 August 2010 at 13:04
Rachel Maddow once said, "I'm undoubtedly a liberal, which means that I'm in almost total agreement with the Eisenhower-era Republican party platform."
I'm really not kidding at all, it's pretty much common knowledge that the United States has been steadily drifting further and further to the right for years.
23 August 2010 at 17:59
Yeah, I would say that something as simple as universal health care being equated with rampant socialism is pretty indicative of a pretty right-wing framing of the political dialogue. The "liberal" wing of the Dems would fit quite nicely in with Republicans from the 50s. And Barry Goldwater, who was considered a ultra-rightist in the 60s, would be viewed as suspiciously "moderate" were he to be in the GOP of today. Let's not forget it was the allegedly liberal Clinton who extended the federal death penalty in a crime omnibus, who "reformed" welfare, and who pursued a foreign policy that involved considerable military intervention abroad.
27 August 2010 at 10:19