> I suggested that developers should use the portals…
I tried this in my latest game (FashionRush: http://www.ovogame.com). But I have been a little bit shy and this only happen after a couple of hours in the game. Basically, I have put an ad for my other game: OvO. There is some kind of story told every new level and to justify a speed increase with the main character, I came up with that:
“Hey, while net surfing a while back, I found OvO, a cool computer game. You interact with this game using your webcam. You don't need a mouse or a keyboard, you just move in front of your webcam. It's great fun but requires a lot of physical effort. If you own a webcam %1, check out OvO. I have played it a lot recently and I am now full of energy. Who said video games weren't good for you?”
I don’t know if it will work… I will tell you later...
Anyway, I won’t get some of Reflexive’s traffic. You didn’t wanted my game, you b*****d ;-)
:) I think it's a nice approach. I'd probably be even a little more overt and add something more specific, like a level editor to the game and the ability to add levels or something that points to something later in the game and suggests going online to find hints.
Hope what you did has some positive impact for you :).
December 4, 2007 at 3:41 PM
Thought this post from Seth Godin was particularly interesting and have wanted to share it for a week or so.
It talks about retail, where the last mile, getting your good or service to the consumer: accounts for the bulk of the cost of the service or good being sold. Retailers get half. Insurance people get commissions. Distributors make their share.In the downloadable distribution model of games, we run into the same issue. After making the game, how do you get it to consumers? Though it seems like the Internet should solve this issue and make it easy to find people to buy, the sheer amount of information on the Internet makes finding customers as difficult as it was in retail. (which, btw, is why casual game portals can give developers a 25-40% of the revenue and keep 60-75% for themselves)Seth addressed this point and should get you thinking about a solution:If you're not going to plan on paying the messenger, your offering better be so remarkable and have such a viral story that your investment in product eliminates the need for media and sales.Many Indie game developers start out with the idea that they can simply make their game and that people will naturally pass it on. Viral marketing is really hard. There are very few products that are viral. Expecting your product to be viral is probably not the best approach.What is the best approach?That depends on you and your product. At the Game Developer's Conference in March of this year I did a session on marketing Indie games. I suggested that developers should use the portals, and abuse the portals by placing things in their games such as level editors and obvious, but obscured secrets, that would cause players to go out looking for the developer's own website. Over time, you can build an audience that comes directly to you.
posted by Russell Carroll at 8:57 AM on Nov 21, 2007
"Paying the Messenger...er distributor"
2 Comments -
> I suggested that developers should use the portals…
I tried this in my latest game (FashionRush: http://www.ovogame.com).
But I have been a little bit shy and this only happen after a couple of hours in the game. Basically, I have put an ad for my other game: OvO. There is some kind of story told every new level and to justify a speed increase with the main character, I came up with that:
“Hey, while net surfing a while back, I found OvO, a cool computer game. You interact with this game using your webcam. You don't need a mouse or a keyboard, you just move in front of your webcam. It's great fun but requires a lot of physical effort. If you own a webcam %1, check out OvO. I have played it a lot recently and I am now full of energy. Who said video games weren't good for you?”
I don’t know if it will work… I will tell you later...
Anyway, I won’t get some of Reflexive’s traffic. You didn’t wanted my game, you b*****d ;-)
JC
November 23, 2007 at 2:48 PM
:) I think it's a nice approach. I'd probably be even a little more overt and add something more specific, like a level editor to the game and the ability to add levels or something that points to something later in the game and suggests going online to find hints.
Hope what you did has some positive impact for you :).
December 4, 2007 at 3:41 PM