I was angry that the solution to degrading plastic was just underfoot for all this time. The solution was found using dirt, yeast and some “household chemicals”. It makes me wonder, did Big Chemistry even *try* to find a solution to the problem of plastic that just won’t go away?
I have only performed science once in my life and that was also for the science fair. (For my grade five science fair project, I conducted an experiment to see if different type of waters - tap water, water from Lake Huron, snow water - created different amounts of soap bubbles. I have never been a model of ambition). For all the other years of work dedicated towards to culmination of my honours undergraduate H. Sc. degree, I have only *studied* science. I’ve read about many, many experiments in university – and in various ‘labs’ I have had to re-enact them. But other than that lone moment in grade five, I have never been asked to ask a question and use the scientific method to try to answer it.
You can go to school and study music, theatre, history or literature and when you graduate, work in some unrelated field but still engage in the art that you once studied as an amateur, local, or community artist. But for most science graduates, if don’t end up working in the sciences, you just end up being a member of the studio audience. If you still have an interest in science after years of being beaten up with textbooks, you might watch The Discovery Channel on TV or listening to Quirks and Quarks on the radio. And if you are way keen, you might have a subscription to Scientific American.
But reading about science isn’t going to change a damn thing.
And yet, I want to participate in what I think is going to be a growing movement: crowdsourcing + science. I’m not sure where I’m going to start. Perhaps The Great Canadian Garlic Collection? WormWatch?
No comments yet.
Close this window