Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Rany on the Royals

"Royals Today: 9/24/14."

9 Comments -

1 – 9 of 9
Blogger Mark LaFlamme said...

I'm still having trouble accepting the fact that we're (probably) going to be in the playoffs. My brain rejects it. I need to get over it quick, too, because I'm gonna need some time of from work. Seriously thinking about flying down to KC for at least some of it. Strange days indeed.

September 24, 2014 at 2:11 PM

Blogger BobDD said...

Yes, me too - I realize that I've been protecting myself from disappointment by thinking the playoffs to be unlikely. But that won't work anymore and it definitely feels like being on a ledge without a net right now. Playoffs, here we come!

September 24, 2014 at 2:32 PM

Blogger John said...

Couldn't agree more on the Ventura pitch count. Though not as egregious, I thought letting Duffy throw 95 in his first outing back was also dubious. Ned needs to be more mindful of protecting the long term value of young pitchers--as well as the long term value of one S. Perez.

September 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM

Blogger Chris! said...

Fangraphs had the A's at 100% playoff odds like 4 weeks ago. So, yeah.

September 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM

Blogger Unknown said...

Just a heartfelt thanks from Oz for your blog. At last, after years when one Royals game or fewer was shown on Australian TV, we are getting to see them, and I get to share the excitement of the Royals resurgence. In the years since I fell in love with the Royals (1996, my first sabbatical at KU), your blogs have been my best contact with what goes on at KC.

September 24, 2014 at 4:32 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

For years I have been arguing with the good folk at FanGraphs that the percentage is never 100% until a team has clinched and is never 0% until a team has been mathematically eliminated.

To no avail.

They even handed the National League West to the Giamts back in June, claiming that the Dodgers had no chance to overcome their 9 1/2 game deficit.

Unfortunately, they are much too arrogant to listen. Not to mention, totally ignorant when it comes to statistics.

Since they are too stupid to understand how percentages work, I simply laugh at the validity of any of the other statistics FanGraphs tries to foist onto us, such as fWAR and ZIP projections.

What a bunch of clowns.

September 24, 2014 at 8:37 PM

Blogger John said...

The BP method is a much more reliable indicator of playoff prospects, because it plays the rest of the season a million times and also factors in the results of actual in-season performance as it determines the results. The Fangraphs' method is based on their metrics on what they believe should have happened (FIP, etc.) and don't consider what really has happened.

If I were a GM and was considering signing a free agent, I'd look at the Fangraphs data to see if a player may have had an inordinate amount of luck in a big season, but for anything else, it doesn't have much value.

September 25, 2014 at 2:19 AM

Blogger Unknown said...

Thomas Burton,have you ever tried to sign up for a paid subscription on MLB.com to watch all of the games? I don't see why it wouldn't be possible in Australia. I live outside the US and watch all of the games but I was in the US when I subscribed so perhaps that's the difference.

September 25, 2014 at 3:36 AM

Blogger mwasleski said...

Hey Rany, when's the post where you rip the Royals for not signing Phil Hughes like you suggested?

September 25, 2014 at 11:55 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.