Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Rany on the Royals

"Mea Culpa. (Sort of.)"

34 Comments -

1 – 34 of 34
Blogger ChasingMoney said...

Fair enough but keep in mind he brought in Farnsworth over Tejeda so counting mis-using Cruz that day he made two crucial non-Soria mistakes.

April 29, 2009 at 8:11 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rany, can you do some guest writing at BP about Greinke's start? I don't see much "ink" there devoted to the best pitcher in baseball after the first month.

April 29, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Anonymous drewfuss said...

zack seems to be missing a little zip on the fastball tonight. hopefully it's the conditions or by design, and not due to fatigue or anything very, very bad developing. gotta like the saberhagen-like change and the wicked breaking ball, though!

April 29, 2009 at 9:10 PM

Anonymous Casper said...

Wish I could get back on board with Hillman right now, but it's going to take a little more than admitting he was lying to us to convince me that barnyard animals are any brighter than he is. Hope I'm wrong about him.

April 29, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Blogger aerobica said...

I have a goofy idea. Keep in mind that I had 1 commercial break and about 6 drinks to think this over:

The Royals have this game in the bag (they're up 10-2 after 5).

**Take Zach out. He's already qualified for his 5th win of the year.

**Pitch Davies tomorrow and let him throw 90-100 pitches regardless of the amount of innings (hopefully it's around 7)

**Skip Ponson's start.

**Pitch Bannister against the Twins. It may be short rest, but if he struggles, you have Ponson to COME OUT OF THE BULLPEN.

**Start Gil...he only pitched 3.2 innings his last start, so he should be able to pitch.

**Start Zach (since, in my world, he only went 5 innings in his last outing).

**Pitch Davies

**Ponson is gone... and here is LUKE HOCHEVAR!

**You've got a playoff-caliber 5-man rotation all set up (Meche, Greinke, Davies, Hochevar, Bannister).

Keep in mind that this is assuming Gil is okay.

April 29, 2009 at 9:41 PM

Anonymous Carl Willingham said...

Don't get too crazy about Hillman, he's still not the brightest bulb. He left his franchise pitcher who just pitched 2 complete games in a row and let him throw 111 pitches with a 9 run lead. If Ramirez can't pitch in this game then why is he on the roster. Second, the umpire was awful tonight, only a pitcher with Grienke's stuff can get by when Brian Winters is behind the plate. Made Grienke's night much tougher than it had to be by never ringing anyone up.

April 29, 2009 at 10:08 PM

Blogger chuckodb said...

Great game tonight! I agree about the strike zone tonight Carl. The fact that Zach still had that many K's really shows just how good the kid is! Great to see Butler hit for power. Hey we're heading into the last day of April tied for first...hard to complain too much about Hillman.

April 29, 2009 at 10:37 PM

Anonymous Curtis said...

Kyle, I think you are nuts.

If there were an off day sprinkled in, then maybe some of what you said made sense. But there aren't. Gil came out because his back hurt, and so the last thing we want to do is run him out there on short rest.

The goal is to maximize wins between now and Halloween, not now and Cinco de Mayo.

I agree that this revelation does mean that Hillman has been better than we thought, though admittedly that is a low bar. And how much of the defensive efficiency ranking is due to the fact that the Teahen as second baseman idea lasted three games due to injuries?

April 29, 2009 at 11:34 PM

Blogger BornBredBlue said...

* Trey Hillman has the IQ of a barnyard animal

* Hillman refused to use him in anything other than the holy Ninth Inning Save Situation

* because their manager is a complete and utter moron ... I’m afraid there may be no cure for imbecilic bullpen management

* Hillman has made some poor decisions this month

* They can’t survive with a manager as dumb a Hillman appeared to be

---------

Thanks for the fodder, Rany. (regardless of whether or not it was all taken in context!)

I'm not giving Hillman a pass. I think it was an interview of one of the BP guys on WHB810 that said a manager statistically contributes to about +/-3 wins per season. I would guess that one, perhaps a maximum of 2, of the 6 divisions in baseball are decided by more than 3 games each year. Which means the other 4 or 5 divisions make the playoffs, or don't, potentially based on the performance of their manager over the course of the season. A stretch? Maybe... Of course, a team has to be in contention first, but you get the idea.

I am NOT ready to give Hillman a pass yet. Opening day, 1. Misuse of Cruz, 2. Boneheaded defensive alignments/replacements, 3. (How we are 2nd in the league in fielding percentage has GOT to be smoke and mirrors.) Letting Greinke go 111 pitches with an 8 run lead, 4. I could probably go on.

Honestly, if you give Hillman +1 for every good decision, and -1 for every bad one, where do you think he ends up at the end of teh season? Let me give you a hint: I think it would be to the left of zero. And he doesn't get points for putting Soria in the ninth with a 2-run lead or pinch running for Butler in the eighth. Those are no brainers.

Let's wait and see... wait and see...

April 30, 2009 at 12:09 AM

Blogger BornBredBlue said...

Other quick comments:

-Greinke is sick good. Scary good. I can't get enough. It's like must-see TV. Every pitch is entertainment. Right now he looks like he can do anything he wants to do. (But in true Greinke style, looks like he could care less.)

-Good to see Butler out of the pits and go off tonight. Aviles with a few hits as well.

-If, if, if, if.... If the offense can get more consistent and put up relatively average numbers. This could get interesting. DeJesus back around .290, Guillen contributing, Butler over .270, and Aviles .250 or better... Then we can start talking.

-Any early season speculation about the Royals making moves and getting a mid-season bat? I know we broke the bank on Farnsworth and Ramirez, but PLEASE Mr. Glass, if we're in the running as the break approaches, PLEASE give Kansas City a Christmas gift in July. Holliday? Dunn? Bonds? Help me out here...

April 30, 2009 at 12:34 AM

Anonymous Nathan said...

Off topic to follow, while watching the video of tonight's game.

Does Frank White think anyone should pull a ball, ever? I love his insights about pitching and defense, but all he says about most of the hitters, every single game, is that they have to go up the middle and to the opposite field. OK, there's probably some truth to that, hitters can certainly get pull happy from time to time. But from listening to White, you'd think Ted Williams needed to change his approach, because his strength is really up the middle and the other way.

Sorry for the rant, but I really can't believe it that he's just said this over and over and over again every inning for all of April. Again, I love Frank and appreciate his thoughts on just about every other aspect of the game. But geez...give it a rest!

I agree with the consensus about the strikezone, at least for the first few innings I've seen so far.

April 30, 2009 at 12:37 AM

Blogger Ryan said...

You have to wonder how the World Baseball Classic might have affected Soria's shoulder.

April 30, 2009 at 12:37 AM

Anonymous Nathan said...

Carl,

111 pitches is not excessive for a 25 year old with a healthy arm. Most good, mature pitchers will throw that many without a second thought.

April 30, 2009 at 12:51 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Re: Frank White and going oppo

I thought the same thing. Didn't matter who was up, Frank wanted them to flick it the other way. There are a number of problems with that suggestion, but for starters.... why is Frank White so confident in his hitting advice? He was a great fielder, but a bad hitter.

But even if he were Babe Ruth, he'd still be making a bad argument, one that more than a few ex-players make, which shocks me.... because they played the game! They know that the worst thing a hitter can do is to: 1) Change their successful approach at the plate, and 2) Think too much during the at-bat. Hitters don't have time mid-swing to decide they'd like to take it the other way. They react and the ball is moving so fast their eyes can't track it all the way to the bat.

I really wonder how ex-players seem to forget how quick the game is. It's possible that what Frank is really saying is that Mike Jacobs should PRACTICE going opposite field, practice staying on top of the ball, practice changing his swing, and then when he steps up on gameday he'll instinctively take that approach. I hope that's what he's saying, but even that violates that first rule, which is not to mess with a guy's swing unless he's sucking. Mike Jacobs is not a great hitter, but I'm pretty sure from the way he goes all out on swings that he's not an oppo hitter. Mark Teahen? Maybe, but even he had his best stretch putting balls in the right-center fountains.

I'd go on with more examples of ex-players giving unworkable advice, but I'm not recalling enough specifics. Suffice it to say that for as much as players knock statistical analysts for their interference in the game, I almost never hear sabermetric talk about trying to change a player. We know we don't know the game as well, but we also know that some decisions don't require instincts (the intentional walk), and some certainly do, and we have no problem leaving well enough alone.

April 30, 2009 at 2:52 AM

Anonymous Matt Berger said...

1. Pitch count aren't as critically important as modern baseball people think they are
2. That was one tight strike zone, but it beats an erratic zone which we've experienced a few times this year.
3. Apparently the Royals' bats adore lousy weather.
4. Zack Greinke, Oral Hershiser and Sandy Koufax are the only pitchers to not give up an earned run in 6 straight starts.
5. Our reason might depend on Gil's back, if he can't win double digit games we're in trouble.
6. I enjoy regaining first place so much, nevermind how many teams we share it with and how close 4th and 5th place are.
7. I love how this hot Blue Jay offense was shut down by the best pitcher in baseball as well as the...well most intelligent/fortunate pitcher Banny.
8. I will be watching Kyle tomorrow with baited breath if he can get things together and give up 3 or less over 6 or 7 our rotation is still in good shape.
9. Think how bad it could have been if this umpire was calling balls and strikes for Davies...or Banny...a dozen walks over 5 my goodness that could have been nightmarish.
10. 10 is more complete than 9 and 11 wins is better than both.

April 30, 2009 at 2:58 AM

Blogger Sooze said...

Couldn't find a contact button, so I'll leave the link in the comments section. :) Zack Greinke has been amazing this season... was he jinxed on Wednesday?

April 30, 2009 at 7:22 AM

Anonymous Dennis said...

Completely off subject, but has anyone heard what's up with Splittorff's health? Just seemed like that whole thing was swept under the rug very quickly and never mentioned again.

April 30, 2009 at 7:35 AM

Anonymous big donkeys said...

What causes a person to get stiff? I think Soria was fine until Hillman failed to use him for at least a week. Then he got stiff. Between the World Baseball Classic and lack of usage so far this season, it's no wonder that something's screwy with Soria.

April 30, 2009 at 8:13 AM

Anonymous DSW said...

Rany, I was upset that Hillman had Bloomquist bunting in the 3rd inning when the Royals were down 2-1. Crisp led off with a double & Bloomquist followed with what appeared to be a sacrifice bunt to move him to third. Only, Bloomquist made a great bunt and out ran the throw to 1st. Teahan & Guillen followed up by popping up on the 1st pitch they saw. If not for Bloomquist's hustle, the inning would have resulted in no runs. Instead, Butler bailed out Hillman's lame strategy by doubling into the corner, followed up with Jacobs RBI. So, despite Hillman's attempt to keep runs off the board, the Royals put up 3 and took the lead for good. But, why was Bloomquist sacrifice bunting this early in the game against an untested pitcher?

April 30, 2009 at 8:18 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

You totally move the runner over with your 3, 4, 5 guys coming up when you are down by one run. Throw in the fact that the Royals haven't been hitting and a one run advantage with Greinke on the mound most likely results in a win. It's a no brainer. By the way, you are talking about Bloomquist at the plate and batting second, not DeJesus. Calling for a bunt was the right decision.

April 30, 2009 at 8:24 AM

Blogger Robert said...

"Rany, I was upset that Hillman had Bloomquist bunting in the 3rd inning when the Royals were down 2-1."

I'm pretty anti-sac bunt in virtually all situations (statistic nerd side of me), but bunting with Bloomquist when you've got Greinke on the mound is a situation I don't get too riled up about. Now bunting in the 3rd inning with Crisp at the plate and runners at 1st and 3rd with nobody out like we did in game 2 of this series...I have a MUCH bigger problem with.

April 30, 2009 at 9:34 AM

Anonymous Curtis said...

Yeah, I was not upset about the bunt in the third inning either. Bloomquist has had a better bat than I expected so far, but let's remember he has had a total of three extra base hits in 2008 and 2009 combined. So the odds on him trading places with Coco are pretty slim.

And he is a good bunter, and there was no force play, so the downside risk that he is going to fail to get him over is mitigated by the upside risk that he is going to turn the bunt into a hit.

And another wild card is the weather. The game was delayed by rain, and there was drizzle off and on. So it could have been a shorter game.

So there are several factors that all make the decision to bunt better. It was still a conservative move, but not overly troubling.

April 30, 2009 at 10:41 AM

Anonymous Nathan said...

I agree with having Bloomquist bunt in that situation, but I don't agree with batting Bloomquist 2nd. Why do so many teams treat the 2nd spot in the batting order as a place to stash a bad hitter? If DeJesus or Teahen were hitting there, you wouldn't have to bunt.

April 30, 2009 at 10:48 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Robert that doesn't make you a statiscial nerd

April 30, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Anonymous DSW said...

I'm outnumbered, and I appreciate the contrary viewpoints, but I still think it is bad strategy to give up one of your three outs in the 3rd inning, simply to move a runner from 2nd to 3rd base. Some statistical nerd can tell me how much the odds of scoring increase from 2nd base, no outs to 3rd base and 1 out. If the strategy had been successful, the 1 run would only have tied the game. In the 7th inning or later, I would play for the tie at home...not in the 3rd inning.

April 30, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is the American league. No bunting in the 3rd inning ever.

3 out of 4 games of Bloomquist over DDJ is going to make me WISH we had a barnyard animal managing over Hillman. Willie Gload is going to get 400 at bats this season at this rate.

April 30, 2009 at 1:40 PM

Anonymous Unknown Royals Fan said...

Rany - I agree and disagree. At the time that Soria's shoulder tightness first appeared (if, as you said, you take Hillman's words at face value), he had already been sitting for five days (Saturday). We'd already seen at least one situation during those days that could have turned on the Mexicutioner. My question, at Unknown Royals Fan, is - could Soria's injury have been CAUSED by the inactivity that he'd already faced? In other words, did Trey cause the injury by letting Soria sit? From where I sit, it's very possible. Like you, I can give Trey a partial pass - but only partial.

April 30, 2009 at 3:30 PM

Blogger Nathan said...

DeJesus has a slightly stiff back. This isn't an indication that the Royals actually prefer Bloomquist over DeJesus in the 2-hole.

Also, between last season and April, there's at least some reason to think Bloomquist isn't a total offensive cipher. Not that he's going to carry the team offensively, but he may be more useful thank Gload.

April 30, 2009 at 3:32 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Batting Bloomquist at #2 and Callaspo at #8 is also stupid in an especially Hillman way.

April 30, 2009 at 4:57 PM

Blogger Robert said...

"Robert that doesn't make you a statiscial nerd"

Perhaps there's a fine line between correlation and causation.

But, it ain't that fine.

April 30, 2009 at 6:54 PM

Blogger Bob Pedersen said...

Is it really fair to blame the injury on the WBC? I understand - sort of - what's said about real game situations differing from spring training outings. Still, though, wouldn't normal side work keep the irregular work from causing problems? I have no real knowledge to go from, but this doesn't seem to make a lot of sense.

May 1, 2009 at 3:46 AM

Blogger Nathan said...

It should be pointed out that making Soria a reliever increased the injury risk. Most top relievers are only successful for a few years, and Soria's arm is as human as it is electric.

May 1, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

@ Bob Pederson

i agree. soria only pitched twice in 2 weeks but it's not like he sat on his ass and played bejeweled on his cell the rest of time. he still threw in side sessions. could someone explain how not throwing in 'game conditions' can ruin a pitcher? i don't get it

May 2, 2009 at 2:37 AM

Blogger Antonio. said...

Are they throwing on raised platform? How many mounds are there at the K?

May 2, 2009 at 11:36 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.