Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Rany on the Royals

"Ned."

30 Comments -

1 – 30 of 30
Anonymous Boots said...

Rany, excellent piece and you captured why I think that Yost would be a great choice for the Royals as their official manager. you of course did way more research into it than I did, but I was aware that he developed some big talent, which the Royals desperately need.

My biggest worry is that if we do not give him the official title and contract of our manager, he may feel more obligated to continue playing Guillen, Ankiel, et all than he would otherwise. His goal right now has to be to win games so that he gets a big contract. His goal COULD be to play the people he needs to win games next year and beyond.

I dont know that I'm right and giving him a contract and vote of confidence would make him do any better, after all we've played pretty well since he has become manager. Perhaps things continue working out for the best, and Im sure Moore knows that whoever he hires next will be the last manager he probably gets to hire before he gets the axe himself. Moore probably wants to make his pick count, so we'll see how this continues over the next few weeks.

May 20, 2010 at 1:34 PM

Blogger blairjjohnson said...

Huzzah!

May 20, 2010 at 2:09 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Epic post Rany, and i love it!

I agree with you, the manager job is Yost's to lose. I suppose I am okay with that for now.


Jeff
@jcneedham

May 20, 2010 at 2:39 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It occurs to me that there are just a handful of managers -- maybe in history -- that are truly GOOD managers, regardless of the situation. (And I don't mean just wins and losses - that's obvious - I mean being able to get the most out of any situation in front of them).

As an Astros fan, I remember how good Terry Collins was for the young Astros and how much of a misfit he was once the team matured, at which point Dierker became perfect. Phil Garner was not a great manager for much of his career, but did a really good job in Houston, managing the drastic swings of performance in '04 and '05.

From the record Rany describes, Yost's strengths seem to be suited for a young, building team, when overall development arch is much more important than wins and losses. But for a contender, his decisions that blow singular games are absolute killers, so he might not fit a contender at all. If that is the case, here's hoping the Royals develop under Yost, and then he's gone once they are ready to make the next step.

(Art Howe also was a good developmental manager that didn't fit mature contenders that well).

May 20, 2010 at 3:10 PM

Anonymous Fast Eddie said...

I agree that Yost could be successful. The teams' record improved during his tenure with the Brewers. I saw somewhere on a blog that he only has the rest of the year to turn things around. Of course if he might be successful in the future, the Royals will can him and hire _________ (insert lousy managerial candidate here).

May 20, 2010 at 4:39 PM

Anonymous GregN said...

Great research, great read. I'm not a Royals fan, but you add so much to the experience of being a baseball fan.
Thank you!

May 20, 2010 at 5:53 PM

Anonymous Paul P said...

Great research and thank you. The Royals aren't going to be good, no matter who is the manager, until the fix the walk problem. They don't walk enough on offense and they walk way too many when pitching. When watching games, our announcers talk about how the Royals are leading the majors in hits, or are 3rd in the AL in batting average. Those are great, don't get me wrong. But they are last in the AL in walks,making them 8th in OB%, and thus- are 9th in the AL in runs scored. You know, the stat that determines who wins and loses baseball games. And just read opposite for a similar rant on pitchers walking too many hitters.

May 20, 2010 at 7:47 PM

Blogger Jimmy Jack said...

Excellent as always Rany!!

Two things poppped out to me as I read this:

1) With the way Yost handled Braun in Minneapolis, is there a chance that Gordon's stint in Omaha & transition to Left Field a product Yost's influence on the team prior to Hillman's firing?

2) Also was Kendall brought in because of his prior relationship with Yost? If so, then this is highly disappointing. Kendall Compared to either Olivo or Buck as we all know is a huge HUGE downgrade.

Yes, I'm reading between the lines here quite a bit, but it also stands to reason that if DM knew that Hillman was on his way out the door, then he was at least prior to the season and before Hillman was officially let go attempting to set up this team to move into the Yost era.

I like this for the fact that at least DM appears to be trying to set up the team for Yost to succeed in the way in which he did in Milwaukee, but if that's the case, why let Hillman start the season to begin with?

I'm officially on the Yost bandwagon. We've got a young team & that seems to be his specialty. But please, please, please give Pena the catchers mitt & send Kendall packing...

May 20, 2010 at 8:33 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am not overly enthused by the choice of Yost.

Your commentary makes me like the move a little more, but not a lot.

I would prefer they make a big splash and get a Bobby Valentine, or Sweet Lou or somebody who has had major success at the big league level.

My biggest complaint against Yost is that he let Kila go back down. I want someone in the manager's position who will stand up to Moore and tell him he is wrong. Another yes man is not doing the organization any good.

I think I understand that together everyone is trying to get Guillen AB's so that maybe they can get something in return for him. In my opinion Pat Burrell is more attractive than Guillen and Burrell cleared waivers. I don't think Guillen is going to do well enough to merit the time and AB's given to him. They should just chalk that one up and release Guillen. For the future of the team they need to see what they have in Kila. Also Kila would tremendously improve the infield defense. I think this is more important for the future of the organization than to try and get something in return for Guillen.

I like that Yost has seemed to define roles in the bullpen. Wood is the eighth inning guy. Hughes and Farnsworth are the seventh inning guys. This has all been established in less than a week. Hillman had a lot of time to establish roles and though he didn't have much talent to work with, he seemed to get the least out of that talent. Already Yost is letting guys know what is expected of them and I think that alone is a huge improvement.

Yost's track record with young talent is certainly a good one and I hope he continues that.

It is my wish that Gordon gets up to the big leagues soon. I hope that Pods, Guillen, Betancourt, DeJesus and Ankiel are not around much longer. Let's get Parraz, Lough, Gordon and any other shortstop in any other organization and let the young kids play. As a fan, I would much rather watch young guys trying and hustling than the Guillen's and Betancourt's and Farnsworth's of the world.

I think there is the talent, especially with the starting pitching Moore has put together, to compete. I don't know how far that takes them, but I would like to see them go young rather than try and reach with people who are not about the future of the team.

May 20, 2010 at 9:34 PM

Anonymous Roy in Omaha said...

FYI

Jason Kendall is currently on a pace to have more at-bats and catch more games than any catcher since World War II. The same Jason Kendall that turns 36 in a month or so.

If it were up to me, Jason Kendall wouldn't even be on this team. He's on a pace to have 582 at-bats and 30 RBI's!!! 30!!!

May 21, 2010 at 12:17 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

PRO: He was in a really good movie

http://sedatedape.com/2010/05/16/i-like-the-way-he-talks/

May 21, 2010 at 2:57 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Roy in Omaha,

You have to have a catcher, or you're going to have a lot of passed balls.

Sincerely,
Casey Stengel

May 21, 2010 at 9:47 AM

Anonymous Wabbitkiller said...

We have no way of knowing how Ypst will work out long term, but we DO knmow this:

Yost >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillman

And at this point, that's all that matters.

May 21, 2010 at 10:13 AM

Anonymous david said...

Great article... anyone care to take a bet on 2013?

May 21, 2010 at 11:27 AM

Blogger pjbronco said...

"I would prefer they make a big splash and get a Bobby Valentine, or Sweet Lou or somebody who has had major success at the big league level."

I was hopeful that Valentine would be the manager when they hired Hillman, but if Yost can steer this team to some success with the young guys and get them ready for "the next generation," I don't see any need to replace him. However, I don't see how anyone would want Piniella at this point. He brings virtually nothing to the table at this point in his career.

May 21, 2010 at 11:32 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rany, I'm ready for a minor league update! I keep track of our minor league teams everyday, but I wanna know what people are saying about our studs.

May 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM

Anonymous rljaco said...

The problem I have is that two of the decisions were so absolutely terrible that I question his judgment: 1-- the Bullington insertion; and 2-- Meche for 122 pitches (certainly for not taking him out after the first walk).

May 21, 2010 at 4:23 PM

Anonymous Stephen Raymond said...

would love to support Joe - not clear how the newsletter is delivered - do you have an email contact for him?

May 21, 2010 at 5:31 PM

Blogger Rany said...

Stephen,

I believe it's delivered directly by email. You can email him yourself at jsheehan@baseballprospectus.com - I think that address still works.

May 21, 2010 at 8:32 PM

Anonymous Stephen Raymond said...

thanks - will try that email address to contact him

May 21, 2010 at 9:03 PM

Anonymous Jason Kendall said...

I will not stop until I catch all 162 games for some lucky team! Play me or trade me--every day!

May 22, 2010 at 7:30 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

My 2 Cents Good manager + Good players = good team. Great managers + Great players = Great Teams.

I will spare you the converse of this theory.

Since the firing of Trey watching Royals baseball gives me feelings of doubt and anxiety. I see it, but don't believe.

Last evening When Farnsworth left the mound bounding to field a mistake swing dribbler my mind flashed images of a ball sailing over Butler's head perhaps knocking out the ball boy, a tall lanky pitcher pulling hamstrings, and a great game ending in typical Royals fashion. Bumbling and stumbling to a head scratching victory or more so, an unspeakable loss.

But, for the first time I can really remember in a long long long time, a Friday evening was spent watching excellent major league baseball played by the team I follow.

So Cool! Balls being mashed, middle relief pitchers getting the calls on 100 mph corner painted fastballs, wonderful camera angle of DeJesus heaving a dart nailing a fine player at third, a young pitcher taking over a game, an older game hero player being pulled for a pinch runner while smiling, the feeling of an fine opponent who'd given up, and last but not least a really enjoyable announced game.

Can we believe? Well, at least for me I'm going to trust my eyes. Go Royals!!!!

May 22, 2010 at 8:35 AM

Blogger KHAZAD said...

I think you could make cases against even the most successful mangers. (i.e. Larussa often bats his pitcher 8th and invented the one inning closer) However, I am happy with the choice for KC. Having a manager with some success in his past is novel for this town.

That being said, why do all the long time baseball men buy into the one inning only closer? These guys have watched baseball as long as I have (or longer) and should remember the success (and team success) of Quisenberry, Gossage, Lyle, Sutter et al.

May 22, 2010 at 1:19 PM

Blogger John said...

Baseball is just like any other sport. Somebody has success with a certain strategy or style of play, and everybody else copies it.

LaRussa invented the one-inning closer because he had, for a number of years, the greatest one-inning pitcher who ever lived. Before he got Dennis Eckersley, he worked his closers very hard--with the '85 White Sox, Bob James threw 110 innings over 69 games to earn 32 saves--and he missed about a month of the season.

Other teams didn't have Eckersley, but they still copied the tactics because: 1) it worked for the 1988-92 A's, and the A's won a lot; and 2) it's fairly easy to find a pitcher who can just air it out for an inning. The only guy who really didn't copy LaRussa's strategy was Sparky Anderson, but he retired not long after, and he didn't win a lot because his relief ace was about the only real pitcher he had.

It's going to take someone like LaRussa to break the trend--a manager held in such high regard, choosing to use his bullpen differently than anyone else, and winning with it.

May 22, 2010 at 11:00 PM

Blogger tookee said...

Thanks for the deep insights, Rany. Yost will be an improvement over Hillman whose innovative thinking was either lost coming back from Japan or was never really there in the first place. It's also clear the players quit on him. If we start to see Kila play, Betancourt sit, and other common sense decisions, we'll know that Yost won't be just interim.

May 24, 2010 at 1:03 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Getting about time for another post, isn't it?

May 28, 2010 at 4:37 PM

Anonymous Terry said...

I was thinking the same thing...Rany must be waiting for the dust to settle before commenting on the "new" Royals. Based on their performance Friday night in Boston, he'll have a lot to talk about. Yost is now 9-5 since taking over a dreadful baseball team.

What say you, Rany?

May 29, 2010 at 8:54 AM

Anonymous dave said...

I'd like to read a draft column myself.

May 29, 2010 at 10:08 AM

Anonymous Donald Zackary Greinke said...

Hey Dayton Mooreon, thanks for yet another loss! I guess I needed to hold the Red Sox to negative runs to win.

May 29, 2010 at 11:45 PM

Blogger tookee said...

Rany,

Just wanted to let you know that I listened to your radio interview w/ Bill James. I am a huge fan of Bill James (starting with his books in the late seventies when I was just a kid). Like you, his writing -- and disciplined, yet innovative thinking -- completely changed not only how I saw baseball, but life as well. Thanks for having him on. I'll be following the radio show, too.

May 29, 2010 at 11:50 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.