Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Rany on the Royals

"The Legacy Of The 2015 Royals, Part 1."

14 Comments -

1 – 14 of 14
Blogger Monty said...

Very nice!

November 10, 2015 at 12:36 PM

Blogger Darrel said...

For we who are long-term Royal fans, who remember the first games in 1969, it has been feast or famine and little in-between. We felt let down when we missed the play-offs in 82 and 83. We forget just how good we had it from 1976-1985 because of how bad it has bene since. Thank you, Rany, for putting it in perspective.

November 10, 2015 at 2:15 PM

Blogger John said...

Great piece, adding a statistical reason for gratitude to the many other reasons for gratitude, e.g. the cornucopia of exciting games the past two postseasons, and the satisfaction of winning after coming so close last year.

Thoughts:

1. Given the longtime presence of both the Cubs and White Sox, and the number of people in the metro area, Chicago has to be the locus of maximum cumulative American baseball misery.

2. Already it feels like semi-ancient history, but the late 1980s to 2012 era of the Royals deep, often hopeless suckiness is still a (negative) marker of considerable distinction, one rivaled only by the Pirates.

3. The single weirdest item on that chart has to be the Marlins' two championships, islands of achievement surrounded by an ocean of failure, much of which was at least semi-chosen.

4. The Orioles were not technically an expansion team, but given the abject state of the former St. Louis Browns when they moved to Baltimore, they might as well have been. Comparing the 1954-2015 Orioles with the 1969-2015 Royals offers some interesting parallels and points of contrast.

5. Random, I know, but for a couple years now I've been tracing the weird parallels between Alex Gordon's career arc and that of Yankee/Cub outfielder Bobby Murcer. The current 162 game career average numbers, first for Mercer, then Gordon

PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB BB Ave OBP Slg OPS OPS+

655 571 83 158 24 4 21 89 11 73 .277 .357 .455 802 124
687 605 86 163 37 3 19 75 12 67 .269 .348 .435 783 112

Lots of possible conclusions here, but given the current debate over Gordon's free agency and the chances of resigning him, it is interesting to note that Mercer's last year as an effective player was at age 35.

November 10, 2015 at 3:01 PM

Blogger John said...

Sort of makes you wonder where they would rate if they hadn't lost their way so badly after the strike. The Royals, for the first 25 years of their history, were one of the best-run franchises in baseball, even with the occasional dumb mistakes like trading for Vida Blue in 1982 or signing Storm and Mark Davis in 1990. There's never really been any in-between with them. Either they've been a model franchise or a Keystone Kops one, and in Dayton Moore's case, both.

I'm interested to see what he does now. He's got a contending team again for 2016 if he stretches the budget and keeps the team together, but they have a ton of 2018 free agents with enormous trade value. Does he try to re-sign Gordon, keep the team intact, and try to do this again with the future be damned, or will he emulate the Rays and start selling off parts for MLB-ready talent, and try to keep the window open long-term by rolling over the roster?

November 10, 2015 at 4:59 PM

Blogger Unknown said...

I liked Grantland. A lot. But if its demise results in this, please let me know where I can send a thank you note to Bill Simmons and ESPN. I will send them separately as I am sure they are not on speaking terms...

Nice to have you back. All is well in the world...

November 10, 2015 at 7:17 PM

Blogger Matthew Penner said...

Agree. Miss grantland. Love rany.

November 10, 2015 at 10:39 PM

Blogger Matthew Penner said...

Agree. Miss grantland. Love rany.

November 10, 2015 at 10:40 PM

Blogger Unknown said...

Welcome home Rany!

November 11, 2015 at 8:38 AM

Blogger tmonsees said...

I know by population the St. Louis Cardinals ought to qualify as a small market team. With the possible exception of the Cards, would be interested to hear your thoughts of whether the Royals' victory qualifies as the first W.S. win by a small market team since the Twins in '91.

November 11, 2015 at 9:45 AM

Blogger Jodee said...

So happy you're back and will let us all rehash this amazing team with you, through your words.

November 11, 2015 at 2:02 PM

Blogger Unknown said...

always great to read what you write Rany - thanks so much! by the way, I wrote something for Royals Authority and what the world series meant to me. would love for you to check it out if you haven't already...

http://www.royalsauthority.com/the-payoff/

November 11, 2015 at 8:58 PM

Blogger Bob Forer said...

Great to have u back, Rany

November 11, 2015 at 11:20 PM

Blogger formerbagger said...

I recognize that feeling of guilt Rany, but would prefer to describe it as being the recipient of undeserved gains. It is not the Great Brinks Robbery, but somehow it feels a little like it. I cannot question it, but I can lean back and relish this moment. It is the Royals' brain trust having an idea and executing that plan. (Pardon me, but I still can't use the words brain trust and Ned in the same sentence. I am however working on it.) Expressing the feelings of many others I am sure, it is nice to have that Rany perspective back. Again.

November 12, 2015 at 1:35 PM

Blogger twentyfivemanroster said...

Then, Opening Day it is!

November 13, 2015 at 2:33 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.